Etheldredasplace

Traditional Catholic Blog

Thursday, 12 February 2015

City of God Part Four

from The City of God Book XX:

Chapter 1.— That Although God is Always Judging, It is Nevertheless Reasonable to Confine Our Attention in This Book to His Last Judgment.

Intending to speak, in dependence on God's grace, of the day of His final judgment, and to affirm it against the ungodly and incredulous, we must first of all lay, as it were, in the foundation of the edifice the divine declarations. Those persons who do not believe such declarations do their best to oppose to them false and illusive sophisms of their own, either contending that what is adduced from Scripture has another meaning, or altogether denying that it is an utterance of God's. For I suppose no man who understands what is written, andbelieves it to be communicated by the supreme and true God through holy men, refuses to yield and consent to these declarations, whether he orally confesses his consent, or is from some evil influence ashamed or afraid to do so; or even, with an opinionativeness closely resembling madness, makes strenuous efforts to defend what heknows and believes to be false against what he knows and believes to be true.
That, therefore, which the whole Church of the true God holds and professes as its creed, that Christ shall come from heaven to judge quick and dead, this we call the last day, or last time, of the divine judgment. For we do not know how many days this judgment may occupy; but no one who reads the Scriptures, however negligently, need be told that in them day is customarily used for time. And when we speak of the day of God's judgment, we add the word last or final for this reason, because even now God judges, and has judged from the beginning of human history, banishing from paradise, and excluding from the tree of life, those first men who perpetrated so great a sin. Yea, He was certainly exercising judgment also when He did not spare the angels who sinned, whose prince, overcome by envy, seduced men after being himself seduced. Neither is it without God's profound and just judgment that the life of demons and men, the one in the air, the other on earth, is filled with misery, calamities, and mistakes. And even though no one had sinned, it could only have been by the good and rightjudgment of God that the whole rational creation could have been maintained in eternal blessedness by a persevering adherence to its Lord. He judges, too, not only in the mass, condemning the race of devils and the race of men to be miserable on account of the original sin of these races, but He also judges the voluntary and personal acts of individuals. For even the devils pray that they may not be tormented, Matthew 8:29 which proves that without injustice they might either be spared or tormented according to their deserts. And men are punished by God for their sins often visibly, always secretly, either in this life or after death, although no man acts rightly save by the assistance of divine aid; and no man or devil acts unrighteously save by the permission of the divine and most just judgment. For, as the apostle says, There is no unrighteousness with God; Romans 9:14 and as he elsewhere says, His judgments are inscrutable, and His ways past finding out. Romans 11:33 In this book, then, I shall speak, as God permits, not of those first judgments, nor of these intervening judgments of God, but of the last judgment, when Christ is to come from heaven to judge the quick and the dead. For that day is properly called the day of judgment, because in it there shall be no room left for the ignorant questioning why this wickedperson is happy and that righteous man unhappy. In that day true and full happiness shall be the lot of none but the good, while deserved and supreme misery shall be the portion of the wicked, and of them only.
Supertradmum at 7:43 pm
Share

Look, read, act


15 days left until the FCC votes on net neutrality. Click here to take action!

Dear Fight for the Future member:

Yesterday morning, net neutrality activists were bodyslammed to the ground by FCC security for attempting to peacefully hold up a banner at FCC Commissioner's Pais press conference on net neutrality. [1] Just as the Commissioner finished his speech attacking net neutrality and shilling for his former employer Verizon [2], activists attempted to hold up a banner reading, “85% of Republican Voters Support Net Neutrality.”

The banner paraphrased a University of Delaware poll, reported in the Washington Post, that shows that both Democrats and Republicans overwhelmingly oppose the idea of fast lanes and slow lanes on the Internet, and support the principles of net neutrality. [3]

No one should get bodyslammed for their free speech because of partisan politics and corporate interests. Join us in telling Comcast’s pals in Congress to back off!

So why was Commissioner Pai so afraid of that one little banner that he had his security tackle and threaten peaceful activists? Because the message on it exposes him for what he truly is: a shining example of everything that is wrong with Washington, DC. Ajit Pai doesn’t represent republicans, democrats, or any other member of the public, he represents the interest of Cable and Telecom companies, the very industries that he is supposed to hold accountable as an FCC commissioner.

We don’t have millions of dollars to counter their deceit, but we have the Internet, and we intend to use it.

Click here to join the final wave of protest leading up to the FCC’s net neutrality vote.

Thanks so much for all you do,
-Evan, Tiffiniy, Holmes, Jeff, Vasjen, and Jessica
Fight for the Future

P.S. the fight is heating up and we need all the help we can get right now! CREDO has selected us to receive donations from their customers this month! The more votes we get, the more funds we'll get to fight for the Internet! Please click here and vote for Fight for the Future!

SOURCES:
[1] Press Release: Net neutrality activists bodyslammed, dragged from Republican FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai’s press conference for holding up this banner.
[2] FCC.gov, Commissioner Ajit Pai
[3] Washington Post, “New Poll: Democrats and R epublicans Both Overwhelmingly Support Net Neutrality.”
Supertradmum at 7:07 pm
Share

The City of God or the Village of God Part Three

In the EF, February 11th is the Feast of The Apparition of the Immaculate Virgin Mary, or Our Lady of Lourdes. The Introit of this feast refers to the “holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned or her husband” a quotation from the book of Revelation.

Our Protestant brethren, when they came to America, confused the Kingdom of God, this bride of Christ, with a worldly kingdom, because they had thrown out the Kingdom of God on earth as manifested in the one, holy, Catholic and apostolic Church.

Over the centuries, the working for the Kingdom of God or the City of God became confused even more with the political structures of American government and the political system. Monarchies were seen as totally evil and democracies as God-given. We can argue about this at another time, on another post but the main emphasis here is that there was a purposeful confusion, replacing a spiritual city with an earthly one.

Communism and socialism do the same thing-create so-called communities on earth but not based on God.

Today, in the Monastic Diunal at Lauds, one prayed Psalm 89 which includes a haunting verse on remembering suffering after one lives in prosperity.

“Then shall we be glad for the days of our humiliation for the years when we saw misfortune.”

Why? Why be glad of hardships which lead to humiliation, the humbling of the spirit?

Without suffering, one thinks that the things one has are one's own. Own has a skewed idea of material goods as belonging to one's self instead of God. As I noted in the perfection series so long ago, detachment or objectivity marks the saint. When one is no longer attached to things or even persons, one is ready for the Illuminative and Unitive States.

That the psalmist rightly encourages remembering past suffering indicates that he had found detachment, knowing fully who actually gives prosperity as a gift. Both riches and poverty are gifts from God to be used according to His Plan.

The years of misfortune create a humble heart, a receptive mind, and an open, loving soul.

The bride in the Song of Songs leaves all to follow the Bridegroom into the desert, seeking him, leaving all to find Him among the rock and sand. She seeks Him until she finds Him.

Remembering her days of loneliness and the pangs of unfulfilled love, the bride rejoices even more in the discovery of her Beloved. In yesterday's Gradual, this book is quoted: “Show me thy face, let they voice sound in mine ears, for thy voice is sweet and they face comely.”

The Song of Songs is also part of Vespers for the day, revisiting the theme of the dove, and combining the bridal imagery with those passages in the New Testament which include brides and virgins at the wedding feast, ready with their lamps lit.

Those who have grateful hearts and have sensed the call of the Bridegroom never look back, but continue to seek Him even in the dry places.

This year, the Church is celebrating the 500th anniversary of the birth of St. Teresa of Avila. Teresa was aware that the Kingdom of God on earth had been neglected, even by the Carmelites, who needed renewal. She understood that the City of God had to be built through sacrifice and suffering, so that when prosperity, in the form of vocations, renewed the order, all could rejoice at the time of hardships, her time, which built up the order.

Americans have forgotten to thank God for the hard times of their immigrant pasts. One old couple told me recently that America was a better place when all the people were poorer, were working hard together and looking out for each other. Those days are long gone.

To desire to build the Kingdom of God, the City on the Hill means focusing on God and His ways, not the way of men. To desire to see the City of God means that one thinks like a Catholic, like Teresa of Avila, knowing that a life of prayer is essential and not an option.

I heard a terrible sermon on the East Coast, in the Northeast Corridor, wherein the deacon concentrated on the worldly life and mentioned that people needed to pray at least a half hour a day. The deacon did admit that he went days without prayer. And this, an ordained minister of the Church! Mediocrity in spiritual matters can never build the Kingdom of God, the City of God. Mediocrity kills zeal and fervor for the Lord and His People.

Gratitude, prayer, meditation....building communities are the block of the buildings in the City of God.

We ignore these at our own peril.


Supertradmum at 7:02 pm
Share

City of God or Village of God? Two Parts in One

The Village of God or the City of God....what do you think is being built? Or anything?

Understanding the American problem proves to be a simple meditation, but leads to the deeper discussion of the difference between the City of Man and the City of God.

Being back in the States has revealed, again, but at a deeper level, the “American Catholic problem”. I met this years ago (thirty-plus) in a study on the heresy of Americanism, but the awareness of the “American problem” was first brought to my attention when I was sixteen, exactly fifty years ago.

My father, speaking about the growing accommodation of Catholics to the world told one of my brothers and me that to be a good American citizen meant being a good Catholic “first”. I began to think about this and realized that Catholic values, even in the late nineteen-sixties, were beginning to evaporate from the Catholic conclaves of Catholic culture. Dad had said that to be a Catholic was to be counter-cultural. He said that in 1965.

Already in my Catholic high school, some students were being taught the New Criticism by trendy priests, and although the abuses of the liturgy really did not emerge until I was in college, I was only one of four students from 1963-1967 who went to high school daily Mass, out of two-thousand students.

The fact that my peers were not as “pious” as me became more and more obvious to me and others. I had no one to talk to except one Lutheran boy, keen on religion, about the Faith. Our conversations, which went on for almost a year, honed my ability to counter Protestant thought.

Then, some youth began to “rebel”.

But, the laxity of morals in the sixties did not come from the rebellion of the youth, in my opinion. The late sixties and early seventies became the time of the first battles of the new demonic influences in America and Catholicism.

Most Catholic parents simply were not prepared for these battles. They had not expected that the seeds of the sexual revolution sown in WWII and the brainwashing concerning sex coming out of Hollywood and British cinema industries, as well as the selling out, yes, of both politics parties, to moneyed interests would undermine Catholic culture. Humanae Vitae was in the future, but the massive future rejection of this prophetic document bubbled like a poison in the souls of the adults even of my parent's generation. Remember, it was not just the Boomers or Gen-Xers who rejected Humanae Vitae.

The problem is and was this. Those good priests in the pre-Vatican II Church missed the points of two main teaching areas, which all good teachers should know.

One, that adults must appropriate their Faith, not merely by obedience but by study and intense prayer.
In other words, knowledge must be made one's own and not merely repeated by rote. One must learn how to think like a Catholic, a constant theme on this blog.

And, two, that to be a Catholic, one must think and live counter-culturally.

I can plainly see now, in these days of complete decadence, that most Catholics since 1938, the beginnings of the last world war, had traded the lie of the American dream for the truth of Catholic holiness.

This conflict resulted in the capitulation of most Catholics here in America—they are Americans first, Catholics second.
One cannot have it all. The American Dream still remains antithetical to the pursuit of holiness.

Consumerism has created a materialistic mindset, as I have written here before on this blog.

Materialism is the philosophy which holds that there is no afterlife. The now is all, the material is the only real deal.

Daily, I have met people who live as if there is no God, no heaven, no hell, no purgatory, no particular judgment.

Daily, I have met extremely wealthy Catholics who think they are poor because their pool is ten years old, they have not bought a new car for two years, and they cannot afford to re-do the living room and dining room this year. They think they are poor if they cannot eat out frequently or continually buy new clothes from the most expensive shops in the area.

I have seen more fur coats in church than I did when I lived in Alaska.

Now, I would have a fur coat, if such did not cost two-thousand dollars, as this type of coat provides warmth in these horrible cold climates. But, to have the best and the most expensive is not the Catholic way.

A family which is close to me, mom, dad, and six children and two grand-children (young families), could have afforded the best as the dad is a successful doctor. They only bought used cars and never had a Mercedes or even a BMW. It was, as they said, “not the W....way.” The “W....way” is to buy second-hand or inexpensive clothing, use the same furniture for their entire married life of thirty-five years, and not ever go on expensive vacations, going on local pilgrimages instead to local shrines. Frugally, they use their money for their children and grand-children and many, many charities. That is the “W...way”. Money goes for TLMS for those in purgatory, and those who need prayers, and other good causes. They have given much money to the TLM cause in their area.
They have never belonged to the country club like other medical families.

I call the “W...way” the “Catholic way”. This family understands the difference between the City of God and the City of Man.

Those of us who have been torn out of perfectionism by the grace of God know that to pass up the best for the adequate is a way to saintliness. To idolize the best, is, simply, idolatry.

Catholics have forgotten, a long time ago here in America, that the pursuit of money must not be the center of our lives. They have forgotten that relationships are more important than money.

Again, for the third time since I have landed on these shores in the past month, I am living in an area with no sidewalks.

I am astounded. I never realized how many neighborhoods in American had no sidewalks.

This suburban development, as all others, proves that community is and has been not a focus of importance to Americans. Without sidewalks, one cannot walk to church. I may have to walk on the highway to get to church on this coming Sunday.

Without sidewalks, I cannot shop for food. Without sidewalks, I do not meet the locals, know the area families, or try and reach out to others.

No sidewalks, no community, no Catholic thinking....We are community people. And, if we are not building or living in community, we are not being wholly Catholic.

The American Dream has destroyed communal life and the pursuit of friendships. The pursuit of the City of Man has trumped the building of the City of God.

Years ago, when feminism began to take over the media, a phrase rang out. “Women, you can have it all.”

Catholics think they can “have it all”. They cannot. One must choose between the City of God and the City of Man, side by side in this culture. The City of God has shrunk into the Town of God in most places I have visited in the past month. In some areas, the City of God is now the Village of God.

Christ warned us of riches. We have the parable of the Rich Young Man who could not give up his comforts in order to really follow Christ. He walked away from being a disciple. He walked away from an intimate union with God. He was given the choice, and he took the road of things, returning to the City of Man, after having been invited to the building of the City of God.

I fear for American Catholics. Those who have chosen the American Dream over God may do so in the coming trials. How many will choose comfort over Truth, over being told to accept ssm? How many will choose being comfortable with their pagan families instead of choosing to build community? Those who have assidously avoided suffering will not be able to accept the final suffering of persecution without tremendous graces from God. Will they turn to Him then? I hope so. But, if the majority of Catholics in this land, those who have chosen politics over religion and comfort over suffering, are in the habit of compromising their Faith, how can they choose at the crucial moment of pain? How many will persevere in times of extreme trial?

Few, very few, is what I see from my vantage point in la-la land.



The Village of God Part Two

In one of Dickens' books, Martin Chuzzlewit, the spoiled young hero,Martin, goes off to America with his faithful servant to make his fortune. This young man is full of egotism and pride. He fails because he is duped by evil entrepreneurs to buy land in a place called “Eden”, which ends up being a pestilent infested swamp land. Both the hero and his companion fall ill, but survive and return humbled to England. The swamp land is described in the book as full of a sickening miasma, a fog of disease and misery. Of course, all those who are there were equally conned by the evil men who convinced them that the area would become a thriving center of commerce in America, with many natural resources and so on.

The young hero is mesmerized by the siren-song of the American Dream.
There exists a miasma over all the places I have visited so far here again. There seems to be a dulling fog of provincialism and gross ignorance, brought on by the satiety of daily comforts. I can feel this miasma in the air. It is stiffling.

This fog does not exist in Europe, because European culture still is rooted in Catholicism, in the acceptance of suffering, in the acceptance of having less rather than more. But, this country, rooted in both Protestantism and Masonry, has worshiped material success to the point of idolatry.

It seems very hard to break out of this fog of comfort. Those who are poor have fallen into disgrace by accepting and voting for socialism, which promises heaven on earth, or at least a phone, food and a place to live, provided by the government, supposedly with no strings attached.

That families do not take care of their poor is simply a result of this lie of socialism. The Catholic way of supporting the old and the sick, the poor and the broken has disappeared into the idea that the government should take care of these people.

They do and will, by slow extermination, hidden and approved by those who no longer take responsibility for the lowest of the low.

The young hero in the story above received the gift of an expensive ring from his secret love which he sold in order to get back to England with his companion. This ring, he thought, had been a gift to her, but she bought it with a tremendous sacrifice to herself in case he needed it. She had a gift of forethought to help him out of trouble. When he finally understands the depth of her own sacrifice, the young man is humbled again and finally become the man he was meant to be—a man who can endure suffering for the sake of others.

That men do not want to absorb the suffering of those around them indicates that they are not men. Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman's famous writing on a gentleman as defined as one who can willingly suffer for the benefit of others seems a fictive ideal here. The peter pans do not want to suffer. The loss of the Catholic ideal of suffering as joining in the Passion and Death of Christ leaves Catholicism emasculated.

In my opinion, it is this running away from suffering which has caused the man crisis among Catholics and Americans, not merely feminism. Feminism partly grew out of the reaction of too many men refusing to be leaders in their families, letting the women take over simply because it was “too hard”.

The evil of matriarchies lies in the depth of this hearts and histories of some ethnic groups, but the root is always the same despite some cultural differences-the abdication of authority by men. Like the young hero in Dickens' tale, too many men want easy riches and comforts and avoid suffering at all costs. The costs include the weakening of leadership in this country, the adulation of sport, and the millions of children being raised without dads.

To give in to the handing over of the apple by Eve was Adam's sin. If he had said “no”, we would not be living in the detritus of Original Sin on this earth. Sloth? Wanting to be loved? Idolatry of Eve over God? The root sin does not matter. Egotism won the day in Eden

Egotism rots manhood. The miasma of Dickens' Eden represents the siren-song of riches without heart and the focus on the City of God. That the hero failed proved to be the turning point of his life.

Dickens' Eden is America's Eden-run by numerous demons and false gods who have created this fog of forgetfulness as to why we are all here.


Too many American Catholics have become successful to the point of forgetting why they are here—to build the City of God, not merely engage in the City of Man.
Supertradmum at 7:00 pm
Share
‹
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.