Showing posts with label converions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label converions. Show all posts
Saturday, 10 August 2013
Taking Pride in Sin
Posted by
Supertradmum
One of the curious questions which always comes up when one is discussing or in a class on Dante's Divine Comedy is why Dante reacts to certain sinners with awe and respect.
The examples are too many for this posting, but one sees the character of Dante changing as he moves through hell. Yet, one is puzzled by his honouring of some of the gross sinners who are forever damned. Now, one can say that there is nobility is all people, and even though that nobility is ruined by sin, one could stand back and admire a person for their former greatness.
However, I think the problem is in the character of Dante, a personification of the author, but also fictionalized, as the poem is allegorical. The living Dante walks through hell and can respond to those in eternal punishment in several ways. But, it is Dante's own sin, his own imperfections, which cause him to pity were one should not do so.
And, this thought leads me to another, which is that some of those in hell in the poem take pride in the very sins which sent them to horrible separation from God.
I see this in others around me. There is a perverse pleasure taken when people share their sins, as if bragging about weaknesses in order either to make excuses for sin, or to invoke pity, or to simply gloat, is acceptable. Those Christians who have come to know salvation through Christ's Passion and Death, remain ashamed of those sins, and those very sins aid one in coming to a real humility. Humility, being self-knowledge, the knowledge of one's sins, brings one to the honest appraisal of who one is before God.
But, to share those sins does not necessarily bring glory to God, or bring others to a desire for Christ's love.
Dante's own imperfections, which gradually are purified through his journey through hell, purgatory and heaven, present the reader with a clear understanding of the scandal of sin.
He reacts sometimes in pity, empathy, and horror, depending on the situation.
It is interesting that newer critics deny that Dante's descent into the seventh circle includes meeting homosexuals, a revision which is most deceitful. In that circle are the blasphemers and the usurers, as well, those who have sinned against God directly, which is why the homosexuals are not in the lesser punishment of the lustful.
Those who sin against God directly, that is against natural law and the transcendence of God, are doomed to dance in one place on the hot sands forever, in the circle designated for the Violent. Violence against God and against nature cause this incessant movement, as the sodomites were seen as having a disturbed, constantly moving, unsteady, and unstable existence.
Dante honours a poet he meets there, by lowering his head in respect,as he admired and copied this poet in life. But, the soul reaches out to him, as if to ask for acceptance. That type of empathy is no longer possible for those condemned to hell.
Sadly, I have noticed more and more people desiring acceptance in their sins. Those who identify with their sins want those who believe in objective truth to blur the distinctions between sin and personhood. Such is the desire of those caught up in the gay lifestyle. Acceptance of sin is a type of consent, and those who brag of their sins have lost not only the sense of sin, but the sense of shame.
In fact, another sin is added, which is that of rationalization. A man bragging to me about how much he drinks on the weekend is rationalizing his sins of intemperance and drunkeness. Bravado can be a form of deceit, rationalizing a weakness. Lying is another name for this type of rationalizing.
In a landslide movement of false tolerance of sin, almost every country of the West is or will be accepting homosexual relations, as well as cohabitation of heterosexuals without marriage, as normal and even as a good. Sin is added to sin in pretending that an evil is a good.
This has led more and more to people discussing their sins in public and encouraging others to do so.
What is evil has been accepted by many, even some Catholics, as a good. So too, are those who are living in heterosexual, non-married relationships talking about their lives as if nothing was really wrong. What merely a few decades ago was unmentionable is now part of bragging and pride.
To take pride in sinful behaviour must be one of the worst sins of all-the complete inversion of truth.
I caution Catholics to not discuss sin, either their own or others, of course, as this glorifies the Evil One.
And, discussing specific sins adds to the degradation of human dignity. If one is trying to help a person out of sin, and that person needs advice, that may be done privately in love and in great humility. But, if one is merely touting personal sins as an excuse for behaviour, or as an example of wilful confusion or loss, one is simply falling into pride.
The popular songs of Mexico provide examples of the glorifying of sin, but even here, in Ireland and across the sea in England, a growing tendency to publicize one's sins is gaining acceptance and even a prurient popularity. If you are engaged in conversations with someone who keeps bringing up their sins, stop them and encourage them to go to Confession. If the sin is a lifestyle, help that person truly convert. To emphasize the sin over grace is just plain self-deceit, as grace is always stronger than sin.
Do not enable sinners to continue in their sinful lifestyles.
One more example may help in understanding the problem. Someone was telling me how much they were in debt on credit cards. They were bragging about all the things they have, and the things they do with credit. I could not help them understand that this debt was sinful, and that their carelessness and lack of good stewardship was not something about which to speak in a cavalier fashion. I stop discussing such things with people if they are not willing to listen. Continual discussion encourages rationalization.
I have said to people. "Stop, I do not want to hear any more of this. You know what you need to do."
One cannot go on year after year discussing sin. Conversion is always possible as grace is freely given to all.
Part of the problem is that the Millenials, and even the Gen-Xers, lack boundaries. Do we really need to know everything about a person? Decorum and appropriateness in speech have disappeared.
Pride, the primal sin, pushes people into these public confessions. Pride, not humility....
Wednesday, 20 March 2013
On Conversions or Not
Posted by
Supertradmum
I re-converted to the Catholic Church at the age of 22 because a nun told me my soul was dead. I would go to hell. I had fallen away for about eighteen month-badly. I would have been damned. Catholics have the Truth at their fingertips. We choose good or evil. For eighteen months or so, I trusted only in myself and Marxist fantasies. My arrogance led others astray. I doubted that Christ was God and acted as if He had no authority in my life.
I converted. I knew the truth of that statement. She was a prophet sent by God to tell me to sin no more and return to Christ and His Church. I did.
If we do not speak the truth to those in serious sin, that sin is on our consciences. If priests act as if a public sinner is not sinning, they are lying to themselves, the sinner, the Church.
We are so afraid of offending people and keeping their friendship, or being nice, that we do not care if they go to hell.
We do not believe people go to hell if we are afraid of the truth.
Yes, people get angry. Yes, people stop talking to you. Yes, people say nasty things behind your back for being honest in love.
I love that nun and honor her, Sister Elizabeth Pickens. She saved my soul through Christ.
God bless her.
God bless you when you speak the truth in love.
How many babies have been murdered in America since January 1, 2013?
Posted by
Supertradmum
http://www.politico.com/politico44/2013/03/biden-pelosi-take-communion-despite-threatened-backlash-159786.html
"But, for Wales?" And, the Pope's talk was on protectors the day before. Who is protecting Jesus in the Eucharist, the Vulnerable God? I am shocked. This is not a good sign.
From on line Merriam-Webster:
"But, for Wales?" And, the Pope's talk was on protectors the day before. Who is protecting Jesus in the Eucharist, the Vulnerable God? I am shocked. This is not a good sign.
From on line Merriam-Webster:
Definition of SCANDAL
1
a : discredit brought upon religion by unseemly conduct in a religious person
b : conduct that causes or encourages a lapse of faith or of religious obedience in another
2
: loss of or damage to reputation caused by actual or apparent violation of morality or propriety : disgrace
3
a : a circumstance or action that offends propriety or established moral conceptions or disgraces those associated with it
b : a person whose conduct offends propriety or morality <ascandal to the profession>
4
: malicious or defamatory gossip
5
: indignation, chagrin, or bewilderment brought about by a flagrant violation of morality, propriety, or religious opinion
Do we Catholics walk the talk? This is so wrong....Scandal!
Posted by
Supertradmum
http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/Ken-Walshs-Washington/2013/03/20/biden-pelosi-stir-controversy-by-taking-communion
Our priests must answer to this travesty. This is scandal. Christ, Who is Present in the Eucharist is being abused. Where are HIS protectors?
Our priests must answer to this travesty. This is scandal. Christ, Who is Present in the Eucharist is being abused. Where are HIS protectors?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)