![]() |
Thanks, wiki |
Monday, 27 August 2012
St. Monica, pray for us
Posted by
Supertradmum
Happy Feast of St. Monica. This is my favourite painting of St. Monica and St. Augustine. God bless all mums and sons today and bring them all closer to God. A mother's influence is great, for good or for evil. Let us pray for all mums with babies in the womb, that these babies are cherished for nine months and after.
Being single and being on retreat two
Posted by
Supertradmum
I have been reading the Sermons of St. Bernard of Clairvaux,
specifically on the Feeding of the Five Thousand. Without going into great
detail, one of the points St. Bernard makes, which has been made by many
saints, is that of gratitude.
In a Western society, where we are so use to thinking we
have gained the goods we have, or in thinking that we are entitled to goods, we
forget too easily that all good things come from the Hands of God.
The goods we have from God include spiritual blessings, as
well as material blessings.
The goods denied us are also blessings from God. As St. Bernard states, we must be
thankful for the sins we did not commit, for the temptations
from which Christ has shielded us. We are to thank God for each virtue we
receive and for each occasion of goodness He allows us.
I have been on retreat, which is always a treat which I do
not take for granted. For some of us, a yearly retreat is a great reason for
gratitude, and I thank God for my few days with Him and His companions in grace..
I am grateful for the Eucharist and the silence, the rhythm
of prayer and reflection and conversation with the other guests.
I am grateful for my entire life, which has been a blessing,
and it is not over, so there will be more blessings for which to thank the
Lord.
Here in the convent, I met a woman whose only child died of
brain cancer at the age of eleven. She has not only kept her faith, but is a
light to all who meet her.
The day after the funeral of her child, her husband filed
for divorce, leaving her alone in the world. I have met so many women who are
alone in the world, I am beginning to realize that any love is a reason for
gratitude.
The world has created an environment hostile to single,
divorced and widowed women. Why? I think because of the lack of gratitude. A
grateful man does not leave an older woman for a younger one. A grateful father
does not leave the mother of his child. A grateful man does not ignore his
widowed mother.
Gratitude is a sign of predestination. Gratitude from St. Bernard’s view is absolutely necessary to please God.
The ungrateful will not see God. They cannot even see their families or
brothers and sisters in Christ, so how can they see God?
In a community or in a parish, one must never take
friendship for granted. It is always a gift.
Thank God for your friends in Christ and be grateful daily.
Keep a gratitude journal and list daily things for which you are grateful. St. Bernard told his monks to remember all that God has
given them and all the dangers from which they have been spared. Be grateful
and rejoice in all things.
Being single and being on retreat
Posted by
Supertradmum
Being on retreat, I had a chance to pray, read and talk with
some of the good Benedictine nuns at Tyburn.
One of the nuns said a startling but true thing which I want
to share. She stated that when single women, even those who have been working
of their spiritual life while in the world enter, “they have to start all over
again.” Basically, the nun noted that those of us in the world as singles do
not have a clue as to how little our efforts create merit or growth.
Why?
There are two reasons. The first is that singles are not
living in a community or daily in commitment with a husband or wife, and
therefore can deceive themselves as to the level and growth of their personal
holiness. I have said something like this before on this blog, but to have an spiritual
authority state clearly that one cannot grow in holiness in a vacuum was a
clarification and completeness to what I have believed. The point is that
living day to day in committed relationships is earth-shakingly different than
living on one’s own and meeting with a counselor or spiritual director
occasionally.
The second reason is that one needs a vow, to be committed
fully to something or someone.
Again, I have written about this here and received both
affirmation and censure. The point is that a vow gives grace which one does not
have without that vow.
Grace follows grace and either in marriage or in the
consecrated life, one receives grace upon grace not accessible in the single
state.
Like the works of St.
Thomas Aquinas, or Augustine, the writings of Bernard of Clairvaux give us
endless spiritual milk to drink on these points.
In his sermon, On
Humility and Patience, Bernard writes this, “Some endure humiliation with
bitterness, other with patience, others again with gladness. The first class
are culpable, the second are innocent, the last are just. Although innocence
may be considered a part of justice, still the perfection of justice belongs to
humility. Now, he is truly humble who can say from his heart, ‘It is good for
me that Thou has humbled me.’”
Someone in the single state does not have the chance for
either the first or the second type of humility, unless God intervenes directly
and humbles the person over and over and over again. This is possible, through
hardships, loss of work, illness and isolation.
In this series of sermons on the Songs of Songs, Bernard refers to the rebuke given to the Bride by
the Bridegroom. The Bridegroom casts out the Bride is she is ignorant of
herself. “If thou know not thyself..”
The effect is one of terror. If we are not sometimes terrified,
something is wrong in our spiritual life. To avoid the flesh, the earthly
desires, and the temptations, one must know one’s self. Christ will cast us
into dire situations in order for us to grow in self-knowledge.
God calls us out to the desert. Like the Bride, the soul
endeavors to seek God in the emptiness. But, there must be rest in that
emptiness. St.
Bernard continues, “…go forth from My sanctuary, which is thine own heart,
where thou hast been accustomed to receive with rapture the hidden and holy
impression of wisdom and truth.”
Note, however, that one cannot go out unless one has
received. To do otherwise is not to be protected against the world and the
devil. This point cannot be overestimated.
Several women around the table yesterday talked of being in
the world “unprotected” by men. This is a dangerous world. They are all
Europeans and all have experienced hardships brought about by the lack of one
to protect them. Some of the experiences were neglect, spiritual and physical.
Some involved violence. All involved rejection.
The Bridegroom, Christ, calls to them to healing and love.
But, only in Him is this possible.
Christ calls them and all of us to knowledge and as this knowledge only
comes through the Church and the Sacraments, it is in the Church we must seek
healing and love. And, in the sacraments-this is a huge misunderstanding among
Catholics. Only through the sacraments is there sanctifying grace.
We who read these posts and others which are similar have
either been called by God or are being called by God. The second ignorance of
self is to fall away after having responded to the call of God.
Now, Bernard is speaking to monks who have chosen the narrow
way. He is speaking to those who have made vows. As one of the nuns said here
yesterday, to take vows either in the religious life or in marriage is a
completely different life-style than remaining, as she said, “floating around
in the world”. She knows herself because
she is in a community as a late vocation. She knows herself because she daily
follows Christ through the graces of her vocation. Her life changed when she
made vows.
We have been given, as Bernard states, a “nature the power
of intelligence is a special prerogative…” We do not follow the way of brute
animals or stupidity. We do not follow hypocrisy, which Bernard calls
heresy. But self-knowledge comes on with
the knowledge of God. This is the way-prayers, fasting, commitment, the
sacraments, the Church.
If we follow God and come to know Him, we shall know
ourselves.
But, as clear in the discussion with the ladies on the
retreat, we must be enabled to both fear and love God.
I would always start with a regular confessor and/or
spiritual director. Regular confession
creates an atmosphere for humility to grow.
Secondly, as the nun said yesterday, one cannot grow holy alone.
It is impossible, and therefore, one must choose to surround one’s self
with companions who also want to be holy. If one is surrounded by the worldly,
one cannot grow. If one surrounds one’s self with worldly activities, one
misses chances for reflection and holiness.
I am reading the life of Mother Adele Garnier, the foundress
of the Congregation of Adorers of the Sacred Heart of Jesus of Montmarte. She wrote that in 15 days, at one point in
her later life, God healed her of sins and fears which she could not do
herself. It was direct, in prayer, over a short period of time. But, she had
made a vow and the vow brought grace. She also stated that because of the days
in which she lived, ten years after being a religious, at an older age and some
maturity, she had virtually no counsel from priests as she needed. She admitted
in her letters that it was very difficult to find the right person to lead her.
One then goes to God, often, seriously,
and insistently.
Sainthood for some is like an explosion of grace, for some a
long process. But, in all ways, the Church is there, through the saints and the
sacraments to guide us.
One need not look constantly at one’s progress of the soul.
But, a steady work in progress, with others who are Catholic and mature, is necessary.
The nun said that singles think they are finding God and
becoming holy and then when they enter or get married, they realize they have
to start all over again. Starting all over again might bring despair, but it
should, especially in the sacrament of marriage or in vows to a religious
order, bring hope. And, hope, states St. Bernard, is the key to experiencing
love and healing.
Good News for Malta
Posted by
Supertradmum
Praise God. Many people in the States have joined me over the summer praying that the TLM would be "released" in Malta. I have recently found out that there are ten, yes ten, TLMs planned in the near future for that island. Keep praying. The TLM community and one person in particular have been working very hard for the success of the Tridentine Mass there. Pray for a revival of the Faith in Malta.
Guest Blogger, JonathanCatholic
Posted by
Supertradmum
Gnosis, Love, and the Incarnation
One of the first heresies ever combated by the Church in her history was Gnosticism. The very first was likely the heresy of the Judaizers, who sought in the AD 50’s and 60’s to prevail against Saint Paul and the other Apostles. They were destructive in that they held and taught, against the doctrine of the Apostles, that it was necessary for Gentile converts to be circumcised and observe the Law of Moses in order to be brought into the Body of Christ. This charge largely came from the Jewish elements of the Church, as Gentiles came pouring into the Church in Asia Minor and in Rome. Later, in the AD 70’s and continuing on for the next two centuries, as the Gentiles became the majority of the members of the Church, a heresy sprang up mysteriously from the midst of the Church that splintered into dozens of groups which began to write false gospels in the second century. These groups as a whole are loosely referred to as Gnosticism, and they represented a heretical group of individuals that claimed to be Christians but who demonically worshipped a plethora of gods they called aeons, of which two of them were, they believed, ‘Christ’ and the ‘Holy Ghost.’ Further, they suggested the great calumny of evil that the God of the Old Testament, the Creator of matter, was the evil in the cosmos and the equivalent of the devil, and that the true God, the true good, was the Unknown One, from whom all aeons emanated and who sent ‘Christ,’ whom they believed to be the Serpent in the Garden of Eden. ‘Christ’ in their system came not to become Incarnate of the Holy Ghost and the Virgin Mary, and be made man; rather, in their ravings, He came to enlighten man to the gnosis that we are spiritual and not matter, and we are therefore Gods and do not need a redeemer, and must merely realize our own divinity to be free from the shackles of sacrifice, the physical body, and morality, all of which were seen as the evil products of the evil Old Testament Deity, the Lord of Hosts. Through this gnosis, or knowledge, they believed man could be liberated from his body and achieve salvation as pure spirits in the presence of the Unknown One.
All of the splintered groups of Gnostics were very divided on which particular brand of their mythology they were pedaling, but they had universal disdain for the orthodox Christians who they viewed as unspiritual and naïve idiots, carnal and silly men who had to work for whatever salvation they could accomplish, since they clung to the physical world and believed matter was inherently good. The early Christians bothered them immensely with their physical Sacraments, such as Baptism and the Eucharist, and the sacramental Sign of the Cross, which were all living reminders of their living faith in God, the Creator of Heaven and Earth and of all things visible and invisible. Despite their diversity, two things were universally common among all groups of Gnostics. First, they utterly repudiated the Incarnation. They universally denied the Catholic teaching that Christ was the eternal Son of God who became truly and fully man for our sake, and they despised the notion that God would unite Himself to us creatures of spirit and matter fully, becoming consubstantial with us while remaining eternally consubstantial with the Father. They ridiculed the notion that He would suffer in the flesh, and that the Blood of God would be poured out for our sakes. In short, the Incarnation was too messy for them, and went against their belief that matter as evil and spirit alone was good. It was this attitude that St. John the Divine wrote so strongly and so dogmatically against, warning His sheep in the AD 90’s prior to His passing from this life:
“Dearly beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits if they be of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. By this is the Spirit of God known. Every spirit which confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, is of God: And every spirit that dissolveth Jesus, is not of God: and this is Antichrist, of whom you have heard that he cometh, and he is now already in the world.”- 1st St. John 4:1-3
And:
“And now I beseech thee, Lady (the local, particular Church St. John was addressing), not as writing a new commandment to thee, but that which we have had from the beginning, that we love one another. And this is charity, that we walk according to his commandments. For this is the commandment, that, as you have heard from the beginning, you should walk in the same: For many seducers are gone out into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh: this is a seducer and an antichrist.”- 2nd St. John 1:5-7
The second universal characteristic of all the Gnostic heretical groups was that all of them repudiated true love, charitas, the willing of the good of the other as other, and exalted pure knowledge, or gnosis in the Greek, above love and without love. It is from this word of knowledge in the Greek, gnosis, that they received their name. Knowledge was the final goal and love was considered weak and unnecessary. With this ignoring of supernatural love, which is the purpose of man throughout this life as Christ and the Apostles taught, vice and sin flourished among them, such that St. John linked rejecting charity and rejecting the commandments of morality as a composite whole with those who were the seducers, who had gone out into the world not confessing Jesus Christ, true God and true man.
The reason why Gnosticism is important to understand is because it has made a vigorous comeback in the West in our day under the cloak of such words as “New Age spirituality” or “spiritual, not religious,” or various other clichés. The false prophets abound. Even among many former Christians in the West, Gnostic ideas have taken hold. Remember the original Gnostics: The precise mythology that was presented by any one group was irrelevant. In varied groups today, many want to adopt the same two general characteristics: first, a scoffing at that testimony which Christendom shows forth to the world, that God truly became man, and assumed human nature into Himself, in order to wed Himself to us forever in true charity, and second, rejecting that true charity which can only flow from the physical Incarnation of God. I would like to draw your attention to this very important connection, the connection between the two rejections of Gnosticism in all ages and what binds them together.
We must understand this essential truth: the heart of authentic love is the Incarnation. God partaking of flesh and blood and the sheer physicality of the Incarnation is something that the devil hates, as do the demons. All evil shudders at it; the Blood of God, as its celebrated Litany states, is the victory over demons, and over all evil, because it represents the depths to which Love Himself descended. God is Charity, as St. John reminds us, and the God who is Charity cannot be separated from the physicality of the Incarnation because this is The Cosmic Expression of Unfathomable Love. If you want to deepen your prayer life, your meditations, and further your distance from the devil and all evil in this world, no matter who you are, close your eyes, and embrace the Crucified God, dead and risen. The more physical you can describe His taking on flesh and His Passion, the more literal you can be about the Blood of God poured forth, the more you embrace the logical outcomes of the Incarnation such as the fact that the Blessed Virgin is the Mother of God, the further you are from evil and the closer you are to God. St. John certainly didn’t mince words when He wrote, in the original Greek, that the Logos was made ‘sarx,’ or that we are to ‘trogon’ His ‘sarka.’ Logos means ‘Word’ as a Divine Title for God the Son, sarx and sarka are almost crudely literal words to describe ‘flesh,’ such as you might describe a red steak or a slab of meat, and trogon means ‘to gnaw’ on, or emphatically, ‘to eat, chew, and consume’ the Body of the Lord. The rejection of the physicality and literal reality of the Incarnation of God leads directly to the misunderstanding of what true love entails: Absolute Union of a Person to another person in body and spirit, in the midst of sacrifice, humility, and faithfulness. All these things are the Person of Our Lord, our Divine Spouse. This is the heart of Christian Charity, and separated from it, we will never find it, but will find ourselves Gnostics. Remember this Charity, for it is the Charity of the Incarnation, and the Offense thereof, that gave the Martyrs strength undergo their tortures and deaths. And we come to embrace this Charity which strengthens us in the Holy Eucharist, where Jesus Christ awaits us, to embrace us.
“I give glory to Jesus Christ the God who bestowed such wisdom upon you; for I have perceived that ye are established in Faith immovable, being as it were nailed on the Cross of the Lord Jesus Christ, in flesh and in spirit, and firmly grounded in Love in the Blood of Christ… I endure all these things, seeing as He Himself enables me, who is perfect Man.”
“But mark ye those who hold strange doctrine touching the grace of Jesus Christ which came to us, how that they are contrary to the mind of God. They (the Gnostics) have no care for Love, none for the widow, none for the orphan, none for the afflicted, none for the prisoner, none for the hungry or thirsty. They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they allow not that the Eucharist is the Flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ, which Flesh suffered for our sins, and which the Father of His goodness raised up. They therefore that gainsay the good Gift of God perish by their questionings. But it were expedient for them to have Love, that they may also rise again.”
- both from St. Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch, to the Church at Smyrna under St. Polycarp their Bishop, shortly before his Martyrdom in AD 107
Cute Monday
Posted by
Supertradmum
I am on retreat, so here is a cute Monday set of photos, instead of a cute Wednesday set.
I love all animals, well, except maybe pythons, alligators and crocodiles...
and what does one do on a hot day in America?
For the "ahh" factor, a loon mum and chicks...I love loons...thanks to Largo for the pics.
Sunday, 26 August 2012
Does anyone care about women in Egypt?
Posted by
Supertradmum
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/018a4fc6-eddd-11e1-8d72-00144feab49a.html#axzz24ZE2kbce
Read this article from the Financial Times. Here is a snippet:
Read this article from the Financial Times. Here is a snippet:
Over the recent Eid al-Fitr holidays, about two dozen volunteers gathered for the first time at subway stations to try to give a bit of relief to women shopping and travelling during days off. Without nearly enough resources to stop the sometimes wanton public tormenting of women, they concentrate on the most egregious violation: men storming the subway cars meant to shelter women from the groping hands, ogling eyes and foul-mouthed catcalls of males.
“The problem is that 50 per cent of the population is scared of the other 50 per cent, so that women can’t go out or work,” said Nihal Saad Zaghloul, an activist with the group Basma, a civil society group that emerged from the revolution, which initiated the harassment patrols. “The men feel they can do it. They know they will not be punished, so they do it.”
...the vast majority of victims were dressed like Wafa Abdel Fattah, a 23-year-old employee of a call centre, wearing a loose-fitting gown and a beige headscarf over her hair, an outfit covering all but her face and hands.
“I have been harassed so many times it’s like a routine,” she says, after getting off the subway. “The young men come into the women’s compartment and they give us dirty looks or say nasty things. Once, a man slapped a woman in the face.”
A great website ... and start a new trend...
Posted by
Supertradmum
Ladies, I found some great sites for patterns for dresses from different eras. The sites also refer to classes and other tips for sewing. For the modest Catholic girl and woman, these can be helpful and intriguing places on-line. This first one has a "show and tell" as well.
Also, one can still find older patterns from the 1960s and 1970s for weddings and formal wear. I think the Jane Austen look could become the new trend for Catholic weddings. An elegant, elderly friend of mine invented one time, when I was complaining years ago that I did not have anything "trendy", a wonderful phrase.
"My dear, YOU set the trend." For some of these below, I would use a little "lace".
A mother-of-the bride could wear something like the first photos, or anyone for evening wear. Here is another site.
Also, one can still find older patterns from the 1960s and 1970s for weddings and formal wear. I think the Jane Austen look could become the new trend for Catholic weddings. An elegant, elderly friend of mine invented one time, when I was complaining years ago that I did not have anything "trendy", a wonderful phrase.
"My dear, YOU set the trend." For some of these below, I would use a little "lace".
A mother-of-the bride could wear something like the first photos, or anyone for evening wear. Here is another site.
The Knight Blogger
Posted by
Supertradmum
This weekend, JonathanCatholic is helping me out with posts so that I can have a real retreat. Thank you, Jonathan, for being so considerate and kind.
Here is one of three.
Saint Paul, Grace, and the Body of Christ
“Often have I tried to force them into blaspheming, by inflicting punishment on them in one synagogue after another; nay, so unmeasured was my rage against them that I used to go to foreign cities to persecute them. It was on such an errand that I was making my way to Damascus, with powers delegated to me by the chief priests, when, journeying at midday, I saw, my lord king, a light from heaven, surpassing the brightness of the sun, which shone about me and my companions. We all fell to the ground, and I heard a voice which said to me, in Hebrew, Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me? This is a thankless task of yours, kicking against the goad. Who are you, Lord? I asked. And the Lord said, I am Jesus, whom Saul persecutes. Rise up, and stand on your feet; I have shewn myself to you, that I may single you out to serve me, as the witness of this vision you have had, and other visions you will have of me. I will be your deliverer from the hands of your people, and of the Gentiles, to whom I am now sending you. You shall open their eyes, and turn them from darkness to light, from the power of Satan to God, so that they may receive, through faith in me, remission of their sins and an inheritance among the saints. Whereupon, king Agrippa, I did not show myself disobedient to the heavenly vision.”- Acts of the Apostles 26:11-19 Knox Bible
If one is a frequent reader of Sacred Scripture, it is easy to pick up on patterns of thought that show up in the various authors of Scripture. For instance, St. Matthew, in authoring his Gospel, sought to show how Jesus was Messiah promised in the Old Covenant, the One who fulfilled it in the New Covenant in His Blood. St. John, on the other hand, in authoring his Gospel, sought to show the New Covenant in more or less its own Light, and penetrated the Mysteries of the Inner Life of the Holy Trinity as revealed to us in the Incarnation and the Person of Christ. The Holy Ghost moved on both of these men in different ways, forming their thought and their teachings to what He wished them to be to benefit the Catholic Church, and then guiding their expression of those teachings in writing and inspiring their Scriptures as the Primary Author. St. Paul is no exception to this rule. Although the Holy Ghost overshadowed him and inspired the Sacred Scripture that he penned as the Primary Author, nevertheless distinctive of Paul’s thought show up in His writings, for God loves to mediate His power through human beings and their uniqueness.
There are two special distinctive in St. Paul’s thought that I want to call attention to, two emphases, that I believe can be traced back to the conversion of the good Apostle on the Road to Damascus. It appears that when Our Lord Jesus called St. Paul to Himself and commissioned him an Apostle, He gave to him two profound Truths in that encounter that St. Paul would never forget. These two Truths that he repeatedly passed on to his Churches were:1) The fact that we must attribute everything in our lives to grace, withholding none of the glory to ourselves in this life but rendering it freely to God, and making no boast of ourselves or our righteousness while honoring other Christians as greater than ourselves. In Pauline thought and in all of St. Paul’s prolific works, this fact shines forth brilliantly. He presents salvation as a process of being continually called over a lifetime of Christian life to the Father who alone is our chief and supernatural end, through the Son who alone is our Divine and Infinite Mediator, and in the Holy Ghost who alone is the very power and presence of God in our lives liberating us from evil and protecting us and divinizing us, and all of this being made possible only by the grace of Christ. Protestants misunderstand this Pauline concept of grace and think that believing that the grace of Christ is responsible for everything we are and all that we receive somehow excludes both others in the family of God (such as Our Lady) being involved in the working of that grace, and even that it excludes us, the ones on whom the grace is acting, from acting in a joyous and real return unto God. Barring Protestant misunderstanding, ‘grace alone,’ or sola gratia, is actually a Catholic concept and one that we must always bear in mind. All of the Apostles taught grace was necessary for all of our salvation, but St. Paul particularly emphasized it. This makes sense, when you consider his teaching in light of his conversion. Christ literally plucked him visibly out of his own identity and made Saul into Paul dramatically and for the entire world to see; that must have been humbling to St. Paul, and he must have carried with him that memory of grace over his whole life. St. Paul still calls to us, through his Scripture especially, telling us to bow to grace, to allow it into our lives, and to surrender utterly to God so that we boast of nothing and rely on Him for everything. May we all heed that call.
“But, in these days, God's way of justification has at last been brought to light, one which was attested by the law and the prophets, but stands apart from the law; God's way of justification through faith in Jesus Christ, meant for everybody and sent down upon everybody without distinction, if he has faith. All alike have sinned, all alike are unworthy of God's praise. And justification comes to us as a free gift from his grace, through our redemption in Jesus Christ. God has offered him to us as a means of reconciliation, in virtue of faith, ransoming us with his Blood. Thus God has vindicated his own holiness, showing us why he overlooked our former sins in the days of his forbearance; and he has also vindicated the holiness of Jesus Christ, here and now, as one who is himself holy, and imparts holiness to those who take their stand upon faith in him. What has become, then, of your pride? No room has been left for it. On what principle? The principle which depends on observances (of the Mosaic, Old Covenant Law)? No, the principle which depends on faith.”- Romans 3:21-27 Knox Bible
“Only, the grace which came to us was out of all proportion to the fault. If this one man's fault brought death on a whole multitude, all the more lavish was God's grace, shown to a whole multitude, that free gift he made us in the grace brought by one Man, Jesus Christ.”- Romans 5:15 Knox Bible
“…but he (Christ) told me, My grace is enough for you; my strength finds its full scope in your weakness. More than ever, then, I delight to boast of the weaknesses that humiliate me, so that the strength of Christ may enshrine itself in me.”- 2nd Corinthians 12:9 Knox Bible
“Our sins had made dead men of us, and he, in giving life to Christ, gave life to us too; it is his grace that has saved you; raised us up too, enthroned us too above the heavens, in Christ Jesus. He would have all future ages see, in that clemency which he showed us in Christ Jesus, the surpassing richness of his grace. Yes, it was grace that saved you, with a faith for its instrument; it did not come from yourselves, it was God's gift, not from any action of yours, or there would be room for pride. No, we are his design; God has created us in Christ Jesus, pledged to such good actions as he has prepared beforehand, to be the employment of our lives.”- Ephesians 2:5-10
“Beloved, you have always shown yourselves obedient; and now that I am at a distance, not less but much more than when I am present, you must work to earn your salvation, in anxious fear. Both the will to do it and the accomplishment of that will are something which God accomplishes in you, to carry out his loving purpose… In him (Jesus Christ) I would render my account, not claiming any justification that is my own work, given me by the [Mosaic] Law, but the justification that comes from believing in Jesus Christ, God's gift on condition of our faith. Him I would learn to know, and the virtue of his Resurrection, and what it means to share his Sufferings, moulded into the pattern of his death, in the hope of achieving resurrection from the dead. Not that I have already won the prize, already reached fulfilment. I only press on, in hope of winning the mastery, as Christ Jesus has won the mastery over me. No, brethren, I do not claim to have the mastery already, but this at least I do; forgetting what I have left behind, intent on what lies before me, I press on with the goal in view, eager for the prize, God's heavenly summons in Christ Jesus. All of us who are fully grounded must be of this mind, and God will make it known to you, if you are of a different mind at present. Meanwhile, let us all be of the same mind, all follow the same rule, according to the progress we have made. “-Philippians 2:12-13, 3:9-16
“Has he not saved us, and called us to a vocation of holiness? It was not because of anything we had done; we owe it to his own design, to the grace lavished on us, long ages ago, in Christ Jesus. Now it has come to light, since our Saviour Jesus Christ came to enlighten us; now he has annulled death, now he has shed abroad the rays of life and immortality, through that gospel.”- 2nd Timothy 1:9-10
2) The second aspect of St. Paul’s writing was that, out of all the New Testament authors, he alone uses the title “Body of Christ” to refer to the Church which He founded, the Catholic Church. It’s easy enough to imagine why: His conversion! What did Christ say to him when He appeared to him on the way? “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting.” Notice that Christ makes no distinction between Himself and His Church; the Church that St. Paul was persecuting was His very Body, and St. Paul understood this! He saw, in the unique circumstances of his conversion, how Christ was enlightening him to the sublime reality of the Church and intimacy She has with Christ. She is His Body, His Fullness, His Bride; Christ and His Body constitute the Totus Christus, the whole Christ, for though Christ has no absolute need of us, nevertheless He willed to not be complete without us. In the mystical Body of Christ, as St. Paul enlightens us, we are all members of the one Christ, partakers of His one Flesh, His one Blood, and His one Divinity. As St. Paul teaches us, in Baptism we are brought into communion with Christ and all who constitute His Body, most preeminently (I would even say, in a sense, singularly) the Blessed Virgin Mary. Through the power of the Holy Ghost overshadowing the waters, we are knit, every one of us, into the Body of Christ and constituted Christ’s Body just as His Body was formed in the Blessed Virgin Mary. In Confirmation, the unity of the Holy Ghost within the Body of Christ is strengthened in the pouring out of His Presence together with His graces. And finally, in the Holy Eucharist, we come to the fullness of communion with Christ and His members, for it is because we partake of Christ that are one Body, says St. Paul. Finally, the most important aspect of the teaching of St. Paul that the Church is the Body of Christ is that it highlights the Divine marital love with which Christ loves His Church. For in the great Mystery of the Incarnation, God the Son proceeded forth from God the Father and through the Holy Ghost was made man, coming down from Heaven personally to be made one flesh with His Bride, the Church. Just as man leaves his father and mother to cleave to his wife, and the two become one flesh, so too, St. Paul teaches us, the eternal Son of God, our true Spouse, went forth from God and descended to earth to be made one flesh with His Bride, His Church, and so constitute His Church to be His Body, completely physically and spiritually united to Him.
“And it shall be in that day (the institution of the New Covenant), saith the Lord, That she (The Church) shall call me: My Husband, and she shall call me no more Baali (which means, ‘My owner’ in a harsher and less intimate sense than Husband). And I will take away the names of Baalim (Idols) out of her mouth, and she shall no more remember their name. And in that day I will make a Covenant (in the assumption of humanity into God in the Incarnation, the Covenant in the Body and Blood of God) with them, with the beasts of the field, and with the fowls of the air, and with the creeping things of the earth: and I will destroy the bow, and the sword, and war out of the land: and I will make them sleep secure. And I will espouse thee (wed you, marry you) to me for ever: and I will espouse thee to me in justice, and judgment, and in mercy, and in commiserations. And I will espouse thee to me in faith: and thou shalt know that I am the Lord.”- Osee (Hosea the Prophet) 2:16-20 Douay Rheims
“Wives must obey their husbands as they would obey the Lord.The man is the head to which the woman's body is united, just as Christ is the head of the Church, he, the Saviour on whom the safety of his body depends; and women must owe obedience at all points to their husbands, as the Church does to Christ. You who are husbands must show love to your wives, as Christ showed love to the Church when he gave himself up on its behalf. He would hallow it, purify it by bathing it in the water to which his word gave life; he would summon it into his own presence, the Church in all its beauty, no stain, no wrinkle, no such disfigurement; it was to be holy, it was to be spotless. And that is how husband ought to love wife, as if she were his own body; in loving his wife, a man is but loving himself. It is unheard of, that a man should bear ill-will to his own flesh and blood; no, he keeps it fed and warmed; and so it is with Christ and his Church; we are limbs of his body; flesh and bone, we belong to him. That is why a man will leave his father and mother and will cling to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. Yes, those words are a high mystery, and I am applying them here to Christ and his Church.”- Ephesians 5:22-32 Knox Bible
“He has put everything under his dominion, and made him the Head to which the whole Church is joined, so that the Church is his Body, the Completion of him who everywhere and in all things is complete… [be] eager to preserve that unity the Spirit gives you, whose bond is peace. You are one Body, with a single Spirit; each of you, when he was called, called in the same hope; with the same Lord, the same faith, the same Baptism; with the same God, the same Father, all of us, who is above all beings, pervades all things, and lives in all of us. “- Ephesians 1:22-23, 4:3-6
“Each of us has one body, with many different parts, and not all these parts have the same function; just so we, though many in number, form one Body in Christ, and each acts as the counterpart of another.”- Romans 12:4-5
“…the Lord claims your bodies. And God, just as he has raised our Lord from the dead, by his great power will raise us up too. Have you never been told that your bodies belong to the body of Christ? And am I to take what belongs to Christ and make it one with a harlot? God forbid… Let every man give his wife what is her due, and every woman do the same by her husband; he, not she, claims the right over her body, as she, not he, claims the right over his (this is fulfilled in the Holy Eucharist, where the Priest calls down Christ Himself, Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity, onto the Altar and to be united to himself and the faithful after him. Christ’s Body is made present in the Churches when the Priest calls Him, because His Body is ours, and ours, is His). “- 1st Corinthians 6:13-15, 7:3-4 Knox Bible
“I am speaking to you as men of good sense, weigh my words for yourselves. We have a Cup that we bless, is not this Cup we bless a participation in Christ's Blood? Is not the bread we break a participation in Christ's Body? The one bread makes us one Body, though we are many in number; the same bread is shared by all. Or look at Israel, God's people by (bodily) nature; do not those who eat their sacrifices associate themselves with the Altar of Sacrifice (in the New Covenant, the Altar of Sacrifice is primarily the Cross and secondarily the Altar-Table in our Churches; with both we associate ourselves when we partake of the Sacrifices of the Body and Blood of Christ)?”- 1st Corinthians 10:15-18 Knox Bible
“A man's body is all one, though it has a number of different organs; and all this multitude of organs goes to make up one body; so it is with Christ. We too, all of us, have been Baptized into a single Body by the power of a single Spirit, Jews and Greeks, slaves and free men alike, we have all been given drink at a single Source, the one Spirit. The Body, after all, consists not of one organ but of many.”- 1st Corinthians 12:12-14 Knox Bible
Thanks be to God for giving us the great gift, by His grace, of St. Paul to guide us and teach us in the excellency of Jesus Christ our Lord. St. Paul, we pray thee, intercede for us in the presence of Christ, He who you so dearly loved in this life. Guide us all and be with us all, in the unity of the Body of Christ, which unity is so strong that death has no power to break it. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost; as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen!
Here is one of three.
Saint Paul, Grace, and the Body of Christ
“Often have I tried to force them into blaspheming, by inflicting punishment on them in one synagogue after another; nay, so unmeasured was my rage against them that I used to go to foreign cities to persecute them. It was on such an errand that I was making my way to Damascus, with powers delegated to me by the chief priests, when, journeying at midday, I saw, my lord king, a light from heaven, surpassing the brightness of the sun, which shone about me and my companions. We all fell to the ground, and I heard a voice which said to me, in Hebrew, Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me? This is a thankless task of yours, kicking against the goad. Who are you, Lord? I asked. And the Lord said, I am Jesus, whom Saul persecutes. Rise up, and stand on your feet; I have shewn myself to you, that I may single you out to serve me, as the witness of this vision you have had, and other visions you will have of me. I will be your deliverer from the hands of your people, and of the Gentiles, to whom I am now sending you. You shall open their eyes, and turn them from darkness to light, from the power of Satan to God, so that they may receive, through faith in me, remission of their sins and an inheritance among the saints. Whereupon, king Agrippa, I did not show myself disobedient to the heavenly vision.”- Acts of the Apostles 26:11-19 Knox Bible
If one is a frequent reader of Sacred Scripture, it is easy to pick up on patterns of thought that show up in the various authors of Scripture. For instance, St. Matthew, in authoring his Gospel, sought to show how Jesus was Messiah promised in the Old Covenant, the One who fulfilled it in the New Covenant in His Blood. St. John, on the other hand, in authoring his Gospel, sought to show the New Covenant in more or less its own Light, and penetrated the Mysteries of the Inner Life of the Holy Trinity as revealed to us in the Incarnation and the Person of Christ. The Holy Ghost moved on both of these men in different ways, forming their thought and their teachings to what He wished them to be to benefit the Catholic Church, and then guiding their expression of those teachings in writing and inspiring their Scriptures as the Primary Author. St. Paul is no exception to this rule. Although the Holy Ghost overshadowed him and inspired the Sacred Scripture that he penned as the Primary Author, nevertheless distinctive of Paul’s thought show up in His writings, for God loves to mediate His power through human beings and their uniqueness.
There are two special distinctive in St. Paul’s thought that I want to call attention to, two emphases, that I believe can be traced back to the conversion of the good Apostle on the Road to Damascus. It appears that when Our Lord Jesus called St. Paul to Himself and commissioned him an Apostle, He gave to him two profound Truths in that encounter that St. Paul would never forget. These two Truths that he repeatedly passed on to his Churches were:1) The fact that we must attribute everything in our lives to grace, withholding none of the glory to ourselves in this life but rendering it freely to God, and making no boast of ourselves or our righteousness while honoring other Christians as greater than ourselves. In Pauline thought and in all of St. Paul’s prolific works, this fact shines forth brilliantly. He presents salvation as a process of being continually called over a lifetime of Christian life to the Father who alone is our chief and supernatural end, through the Son who alone is our Divine and Infinite Mediator, and in the Holy Ghost who alone is the very power and presence of God in our lives liberating us from evil and protecting us and divinizing us, and all of this being made possible only by the grace of Christ. Protestants misunderstand this Pauline concept of grace and think that believing that the grace of Christ is responsible for everything we are and all that we receive somehow excludes both others in the family of God (such as Our Lady) being involved in the working of that grace, and even that it excludes us, the ones on whom the grace is acting, from acting in a joyous and real return unto God. Barring Protestant misunderstanding, ‘grace alone,’ or sola gratia, is actually a Catholic concept and one that we must always bear in mind. All of the Apostles taught grace was necessary for all of our salvation, but St. Paul particularly emphasized it. This makes sense, when you consider his teaching in light of his conversion. Christ literally plucked him visibly out of his own identity and made Saul into Paul dramatically and for the entire world to see; that must have been humbling to St. Paul, and he must have carried with him that memory of grace over his whole life. St. Paul still calls to us, through his Scripture especially, telling us to bow to grace, to allow it into our lives, and to surrender utterly to God so that we boast of nothing and rely on Him for everything. May we all heed that call.
“But, in these days, God's way of justification has at last been brought to light, one which was attested by the law and the prophets, but stands apart from the law; God's way of justification through faith in Jesus Christ, meant for everybody and sent down upon everybody without distinction, if he has faith. All alike have sinned, all alike are unworthy of God's praise. And justification comes to us as a free gift from his grace, through our redemption in Jesus Christ. God has offered him to us as a means of reconciliation, in virtue of faith, ransoming us with his Blood. Thus God has vindicated his own holiness, showing us why he overlooked our former sins in the days of his forbearance; and he has also vindicated the holiness of Jesus Christ, here and now, as one who is himself holy, and imparts holiness to those who take their stand upon faith in him. What has become, then, of your pride? No room has been left for it. On what principle? The principle which depends on observances (of the Mosaic, Old Covenant Law)? No, the principle which depends on faith.”- Romans 3:21-27 Knox Bible
“Only, the grace which came to us was out of all proportion to the fault. If this one man's fault brought death on a whole multitude, all the more lavish was God's grace, shown to a whole multitude, that free gift he made us in the grace brought by one Man, Jesus Christ.”- Romans 5:15 Knox Bible
“…but he (Christ) told me, My grace is enough for you; my strength finds its full scope in your weakness. More than ever, then, I delight to boast of the weaknesses that humiliate me, so that the strength of Christ may enshrine itself in me.”- 2nd Corinthians 12:9 Knox Bible
“Our sins had made dead men of us, and he, in giving life to Christ, gave life to us too; it is his grace that has saved you; raised us up too, enthroned us too above the heavens, in Christ Jesus. He would have all future ages see, in that clemency which he showed us in Christ Jesus, the surpassing richness of his grace. Yes, it was grace that saved you, with a faith for its instrument; it did not come from yourselves, it was God's gift, not from any action of yours, or there would be room for pride. No, we are his design; God has created us in Christ Jesus, pledged to such good actions as he has prepared beforehand, to be the employment of our lives.”- Ephesians 2:5-10
“Beloved, you have always shown yourselves obedient; and now that I am at a distance, not less but much more than when I am present, you must work to earn your salvation, in anxious fear. Both the will to do it and the accomplishment of that will are something which God accomplishes in you, to carry out his loving purpose… In him (Jesus Christ) I would render my account, not claiming any justification that is my own work, given me by the [Mosaic] Law, but the justification that comes from believing in Jesus Christ, God's gift on condition of our faith. Him I would learn to know, and the virtue of his Resurrection, and what it means to share his Sufferings, moulded into the pattern of his death, in the hope of achieving resurrection from the dead. Not that I have already won the prize, already reached fulfilment. I only press on, in hope of winning the mastery, as Christ Jesus has won the mastery over me. No, brethren, I do not claim to have the mastery already, but this at least I do; forgetting what I have left behind, intent on what lies before me, I press on with the goal in view, eager for the prize, God's heavenly summons in Christ Jesus. All of us who are fully grounded must be of this mind, and God will make it known to you, if you are of a different mind at present. Meanwhile, let us all be of the same mind, all follow the same rule, according to the progress we have made. “-Philippians 2:12-13, 3:9-16
“Has he not saved us, and called us to a vocation of holiness? It was not because of anything we had done; we owe it to his own design, to the grace lavished on us, long ages ago, in Christ Jesus. Now it has come to light, since our Saviour Jesus Christ came to enlighten us; now he has annulled death, now he has shed abroad the rays of life and immortality, through that gospel.”- 2nd Timothy 1:9-10
2) The second aspect of St. Paul’s writing was that, out of all the New Testament authors, he alone uses the title “Body of Christ” to refer to the Church which He founded, the Catholic Church. It’s easy enough to imagine why: His conversion! What did Christ say to him when He appeared to him on the way? “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting.” Notice that Christ makes no distinction between Himself and His Church; the Church that St. Paul was persecuting was His very Body, and St. Paul understood this! He saw, in the unique circumstances of his conversion, how Christ was enlightening him to the sublime reality of the Church and intimacy She has with Christ. She is His Body, His Fullness, His Bride; Christ and His Body constitute the Totus Christus, the whole Christ, for though Christ has no absolute need of us, nevertheless He willed to not be complete without us. In the mystical Body of Christ, as St. Paul enlightens us, we are all members of the one Christ, partakers of His one Flesh, His one Blood, and His one Divinity. As St. Paul teaches us, in Baptism we are brought into communion with Christ and all who constitute His Body, most preeminently (I would even say, in a sense, singularly) the Blessed Virgin Mary. Through the power of the Holy Ghost overshadowing the waters, we are knit, every one of us, into the Body of Christ and constituted Christ’s Body just as His Body was formed in the Blessed Virgin Mary. In Confirmation, the unity of the Holy Ghost within the Body of Christ is strengthened in the pouring out of His Presence together with His graces. And finally, in the Holy Eucharist, we come to the fullness of communion with Christ and His members, for it is because we partake of Christ that are one Body, says St. Paul. Finally, the most important aspect of the teaching of St. Paul that the Church is the Body of Christ is that it highlights the Divine marital love with which Christ loves His Church. For in the great Mystery of the Incarnation, God the Son proceeded forth from God the Father and through the Holy Ghost was made man, coming down from Heaven personally to be made one flesh with His Bride, the Church. Just as man leaves his father and mother to cleave to his wife, and the two become one flesh, so too, St. Paul teaches us, the eternal Son of God, our true Spouse, went forth from God and descended to earth to be made one flesh with His Bride, His Church, and so constitute His Church to be His Body, completely physically and spiritually united to Him.
“And it shall be in that day (the institution of the New Covenant), saith the Lord, That she (The Church) shall call me: My Husband, and she shall call me no more Baali (which means, ‘My owner’ in a harsher and less intimate sense than Husband). And I will take away the names of Baalim (Idols) out of her mouth, and she shall no more remember their name. And in that day I will make a Covenant (in the assumption of humanity into God in the Incarnation, the Covenant in the Body and Blood of God) with them, with the beasts of the field, and with the fowls of the air, and with the creeping things of the earth: and I will destroy the bow, and the sword, and war out of the land: and I will make them sleep secure. And I will espouse thee (wed you, marry you) to me for ever: and I will espouse thee to me in justice, and judgment, and in mercy, and in commiserations. And I will espouse thee to me in faith: and thou shalt know that I am the Lord.”- Osee (Hosea the Prophet) 2:16-20 Douay Rheims
“Wives must obey their husbands as they would obey the Lord.The man is the head to which the woman's body is united, just as Christ is the head of the Church, he, the Saviour on whom the safety of his body depends; and women must owe obedience at all points to their husbands, as the Church does to Christ. You who are husbands must show love to your wives, as Christ showed love to the Church when he gave himself up on its behalf. He would hallow it, purify it by bathing it in the water to which his word gave life; he would summon it into his own presence, the Church in all its beauty, no stain, no wrinkle, no such disfigurement; it was to be holy, it was to be spotless. And that is how husband ought to love wife, as if she were his own body; in loving his wife, a man is but loving himself. It is unheard of, that a man should bear ill-will to his own flesh and blood; no, he keeps it fed and warmed; and so it is with Christ and his Church; we are limbs of his body; flesh and bone, we belong to him. That is why a man will leave his father and mother and will cling to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. Yes, those words are a high mystery, and I am applying them here to Christ and his Church.”- Ephesians 5:22-32 Knox Bible
“He has put everything under his dominion, and made him the Head to which the whole Church is joined, so that the Church is his Body, the Completion of him who everywhere and in all things is complete… [be] eager to preserve that unity the Spirit gives you, whose bond is peace. You are one Body, with a single Spirit; each of you, when he was called, called in the same hope; with the same Lord, the same faith, the same Baptism; with the same God, the same Father, all of us, who is above all beings, pervades all things, and lives in all of us. “- Ephesians 1:22-23, 4:3-6
“Each of us has one body, with many different parts, and not all these parts have the same function; just so we, though many in number, form one Body in Christ, and each acts as the counterpart of another.”- Romans 12:4-5
“…the Lord claims your bodies. And God, just as he has raised our Lord from the dead, by his great power will raise us up too. Have you never been told that your bodies belong to the body of Christ? And am I to take what belongs to Christ and make it one with a harlot? God forbid… Let every man give his wife what is her due, and every woman do the same by her husband; he, not she, claims the right over her body, as she, not he, claims the right over his (this is fulfilled in the Holy Eucharist, where the Priest calls down Christ Himself, Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity, onto the Altar and to be united to himself and the faithful after him. Christ’s Body is made present in the Churches when the Priest calls Him, because His Body is ours, and ours, is His). “- 1st Corinthians 6:13-15, 7:3-4 Knox Bible
“I am speaking to you as men of good sense, weigh my words for yourselves. We have a Cup that we bless, is not this Cup we bless a participation in Christ's Blood? Is not the bread we break a participation in Christ's Body? The one bread makes us one Body, though we are many in number; the same bread is shared by all. Or look at Israel, God's people by (bodily) nature; do not those who eat their sacrifices associate themselves with the Altar of Sacrifice (in the New Covenant, the Altar of Sacrifice is primarily the Cross and secondarily the Altar-Table in our Churches; with both we associate ourselves when we partake of the Sacrifices of the Body and Blood of Christ)?”- 1st Corinthians 10:15-18 Knox Bible
“A man's body is all one, though it has a number of different organs; and all this multitude of organs goes to make up one body; so it is with Christ. We too, all of us, have been Baptized into a single Body by the power of a single Spirit, Jews and Greeks, slaves and free men alike, we have all been given drink at a single Source, the one Spirit. The Body, after all, consists not of one organ but of many.”- 1st Corinthians 12:12-14 Knox Bible
Thanks be to God for giving us the great gift, by His grace, of St. Paul to guide us and teach us in the excellency of Jesus Christ our Lord. St. Paul, we pray thee, intercede for us in the presence of Christ, He who you so dearly loved in this life. Guide us all and be with us all, in the unity of the Body of Christ, which unity is so strong that death has no power to break it. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost; as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen!
Saturday, 25 August 2012
More courage than Notre Shame: University of Virginia refuses Obama Visit
Posted by
Supertradmum
Find the complete story here.
The NBC29 newsroom has received the following statement from University of Virginia Spokesperson Carol Wood:
Many of you have asked about whether President Obama will be holding an upcoming campaign rally in Charlottesville at the University of Virginia.
I am writing to tell you that the University met with five members of the Obama Presidential Campaign on Wednesday. The campaign requested the use of one of two outdoor University venues — the Amphitheater or the Harrison-Small Library plaza. After reviewing the campaign's request for either of these two sites and the impact on the University, the University declined the request for the following reasons:
- As you know, Aug. 29 is the second day of classes overall and the first day of classes on the Monday/Wednesday/Friday academic schedule.
- The use of either of the desired sites would require closing buildings adjacent to the sites for the entire day.
- The cancellation of 186 classes would occur if the site is the Amphitheater or closing of the libraries and Newcomb dining if the site is the Harrison-Small plaza. This would result in an extraordinary disruption of the second day of the new semester.
- In addition to the disruption to classes, the University would have to bear the full cost of security — a substantial and open-ended expenditure of staff time and money.
- By University policy, we would also have to offer the same accommodations and bear the same costs for other candidates. Both our federal and state tax-exempt status requires that we not favor any candidate.
- The Secret Service will have final approval on the site chosen and will dictate the security requirements, but at a minimum the buildings adjacent to the event venue would need to be closed on Aug. 29. Adjacent buildings will be searched and secured with officers posted in each starting at least 6 hours prior to the event.
Additional details: The use of McIntire Amphitheater would require the closing of the following buildings on Aug. 29: Bryan Hall, Cocke Hall, Garrett Hall, Minor Hall, and possibly Maury Monroe halls. The parking lots behind Bryan and Clark would have to be closed for the day, as well as a portion of McCormick Road.
The use of the Harrison-Small Special Collections Library would require the closing of the Alderman Library, Special Collections Library, the temporary dining facility, Peabody Hall, and possibly Monroe Hall, the rooms along the West Range and a portion of McCormick Road.
OMGoodness, Cooking
Posted by
Supertradmum
I love to cook and I love to cook for parties. I can "do" Mexican, Chinese, Indian, Greek, American, Italian, Vegetarian, and some--a little--Czech and Ukrainian without looking at a cookbook. I learned to cook for groups in my twenties, and when I was in grad school, I did some party catering.
When I was in kindergarten, the classroom had an upstairs loft which was a complete wooden kitchen for little ones complete with all the pots and pans and dishes. Even the boys liked it.
At home, when we entertained, it did not have to be fancy. But, it had to be fun. We would have all the single, male teachers over on the weekend. It was great fun.
When my son was ten, I bought him a cookbook. He is a great cook. But, I have just learned in the past few years that there are many, many young women who do not know how to cook.
I did not take home economics, as I was in the college prep track in high-school. My brothers and I went to a high school with two campuses, basically on the same site: one for girls and one for boys. Two of my brothers took bachelor classes where they learned how to cook, sew and do laundry. It was very helpful for them to have those skills when they went to university.
Why is it that so many women do not know how to cook?
Here are the reasons I have gleaned over the past few years:
one) small families eat out and most families are now small;
two) mom is not at home and does not teach cooking to the kids and people eat on the go;
three) women are in rebellion and feel like they do not want to be "domestic slaves";
four) it is not trendy;
five) no one eats together any more--people graze.
six) people no longer entertain in the home-we did this all the time but then, Americans like to eat.
Well, there are probably more reasons. But, women should realize that cooking is fun. It is an art. It is creative.
Millennials, learn how to cook. Have some fun. Eat and share. Make it trendy again to get together with your friends and cook.
When I was in kindergarten, the classroom had an upstairs loft which was a complete wooden kitchen for little ones complete with all the pots and pans and dishes. Even the boys liked it.
At home, when we entertained, it did not have to be fancy. But, it had to be fun. We would have all the single, male teachers over on the weekend. It was great fun.
When my son was ten, I bought him a cookbook. He is a great cook. But, I have just learned in the past few years that there are many, many young women who do not know how to cook.
I did not take home economics, as I was in the college prep track in high-school. My brothers and I went to a high school with two campuses, basically on the same site: one for girls and one for boys. Two of my brothers took bachelor classes where they learned how to cook, sew and do laundry. It was very helpful for them to have those skills when they went to university.
Why is it that so many women do not know how to cook?
Here are the reasons I have gleaned over the past few years:
one) small families eat out and most families are now small;
two) mom is not at home and does not teach cooking to the kids and people eat on the go;
three) women are in rebellion and feel like they do not want to be "domestic slaves";
four) it is not trendy;
five) no one eats together any more--people graze.
six) people no longer entertain in the home-we did this all the time but then, Americans like to eat.
Well, there are probably more reasons. But, women should realize that cooking is fun. It is an art. It is creative.
Millennials, learn how to cook. Have some fun. Eat and share. Make it trendy again to get together with your friends and cook.
A Rant on Anti-Mummy, Anti-Happy Housewife Language
Posted by
Supertradmum
Ok, I am having a hissy fit. Until I moved to England for this summer, I never saw or heard the label, "yummy mummy". Maybe living in the Midwest of America, where there are stay-at-home moms, and moving in the home schooling, stay-at-home mom community, I just did not hear it.
I was a happy housewife and that stay-at-home period of my life was one of the most creative for me. I was extremely busy. I knew I was like a little core of stability in the home, around which much activity could be planned and done. This phrase applies to having children, which is another bug-bear of the socialist mindset. Having kids is a no-no, still.
This phrase is "all over' the media here and I am sick of it. The term began when it was applied to rich and famous moms, especially celebrity moms. But, now it is used for all stay-at-home moms.
Even Mrs. Blair used the term a few weeks ago. It is an insulting term which must be addressed, as it it based on false and cruel premises.
The term, which refers to moms who choose to stay at home, implies that the husband makes enough money for the mom to do so. The phrase is based on an idea that there is a slave man out there who works himself to death so that mom and kids can stay at home.
Most moms should stay at home regardless of income. Coming from a family where we took one holiday per year, I am shocked at the money wasted on four or even five holidays here. One mum told me she works for holiday money. Her salary pays for the family trips. I wonder when she will realize that she is doing this for herself and not for her children. This is adult self-deceit. Children who have stay-at-home moms do not need many holidays, as down time can be put into the schedule.
The term is against the Catholic view of marriage and procreation. Catholic parents are open to God's gift of life, which means nurturing those little lives and not farming children out to daycares.
The term is part of the language of Marxism. It implies that there is a class divide in the raising of children. This is simply not true.
I am not referring to families where there is a single parent. But, in a two-parent household, the nurturing should be done in the home. I am shocked at the vehement responses I get when I try to discuss this with women.
A generation or two have closed the door to even thinking about staying at home. I understand that with inflation it is harder to live on one salary. But, it is not impossible.
Why the press keeps publishing commentaries on yummy mummies is a problem of ideology. Take your pick. Consumerism and Marxism push the term.
Kids do not need all the stuff they have. A twenty-something smart woman told me that she had everything growing up. She and her brother lacked for nothing, and her mother worked. Why? Why the preoccupation with all the stuff? Why the preoccupation with multiple holidays?
Dads, stick up for your stay-at-home moms. Moms, stick up for yourselves and be proud.
Children need a stable home environment. They need someone to be there for them all the time. They need care and love on a daily basis, and not just before or after day-care.
This phrase is so horrible and divides the society on purpose. Socialists want to undermine the family and such a term does so...
Moms, be proud and do your best, but stay at home.
I was a happy housewife and that stay-at-home period of my life was one of the most creative for me. I was extremely busy. I knew I was like a little core of stability in the home, around which much activity could be planned and done. This phrase applies to having children, which is another bug-bear of the socialist mindset. Having kids is a no-no, still.
This phrase is "all over' the media here and I am sick of it. The term began when it was applied to rich and famous moms, especially celebrity moms. But, now it is used for all stay-at-home moms.
Even Mrs. Blair used the term a few weeks ago. It is an insulting term which must be addressed, as it it based on false and cruel premises.
The term, which refers to moms who choose to stay at home, implies that the husband makes enough money for the mom to do so. The phrase is based on an idea that there is a slave man out there who works himself to death so that mom and kids can stay at home.
Most moms should stay at home regardless of income. Coming from a family where we took one holiday per year, I am shocked at the money wasted on four or even five holidays here. One mum told me she works for holiday money. Her salary pays for the family trips. I wonder when she will realize that she is doing this for herself and not for her children. This is adult self-deceit. Children who have stay-at-home moms do not need many holidays, as down time can be put into the schedule.
The term is against the Catholic view of marriage and procreation. Catholic parents are open to God's gift of life, which means nurturing those little lives and not farming children out to daycares.
The term is part of the language of Marxism. It implies that there is a class divide in the raising of children. This is simply not true.
I am not referring to families where there is a single parent. But, in a two-parent household, the nurturing should be done in the home. I am shocked at the vehement responses I get when I try to discuss this with women.
A generation or two have closed the door to even thinking about staying at home. I understand that with inflation it is harder to live on one salary. But, it is not impossible.
Why the press keeps publishing commentaries on yummy mummies is a problem of ideology. Take your pick. Consumerism and Marxism push the term.
Kids do not need all the stuff they have. A twenty-something smart woman told me that she had everything growing up. She and her brother lacked for nothing, and her mother worked. Why? Why the preoccupation with all the stuff? Why the preoccupation with multiple holidays?
Dads, stick up for your stay-at-home moms. Moms, stick up for yourselves and be proud.
Children need a stable home environment. They need someone to be there for them all the time. They need care and love on a daily basis, and not just before or after day-care.
This phrase is so horrible and divides the society on purpose. Socialists want to undermine the family and such a term does so...
Moms, be proud and do your best, but stay at home.
No Anonymous
Posted by
Supertradmum
Dear Readers,
Weekly, I am still receiving Anonymous posts, despite posts on this point, and the note on the right side bar. Please choose a name for posting. For one thing, if I get three or four Anonymous on one subject, how can I answer the question to the specific person?
Thank you for considering this option again. I do not post Anonymous posts.
Weekly, I am still receiving Anonymous posts, despite posts on this point, and the note on the right side bar. Please choose a name for posting. For one thing, if I get three or four Anonymous on one subject, how can I answer the question to the specific person?
Thank you for considering this option again. I do not post Anonymous posts.
Friday, 24 August 2012
The real meaning of retreat and the Thermopylae of Texas
Posted by
Supertradmum
I am retreating from Saturday through Tuesday. It is a real retreat. Every year, once a year, I try and go to a Benedictine monastery for a retreat. I love the hours, the silence, the chant, either in English or Latin.
But, this year, I am really retreating. I live on the border of Notting Hill and Bayswater, and I am escaping from the Carnival, which will literally come up to my door. It is horrible. The original meaning of this carnival, to unite the immigrant communities, is gone. It is money and sex, sex and money.
The Notting Hill Carnival is the largest in Europe. It has never been connected to a feast day, such as the carnivals for Mardi Gras or Epiphany. It is purely secular. Many of the locals have left for the weekend. The rubbish skips have gone since yesterday. I cannot even empty my garbage. All the parking is highly restricted, which it is anyway in this area. I can hear steel bands in the night....it is all surreal.
I am retreating. I shall blog, but lightly. Perhaps I shall do three posts instead of six. And, JonathanCatholic has graciously written two posts for me so that I can retreat.
Otherwise, I would feel like James Bowie or Davy Crockett at the Alamo.
Here is poem for the heck of it from the newspaper, the Telegraph and Texas Register, August 9, 1836.
The Texan Marseillaise.
Texians, to your banner fly,
Texians, now your valor try,
Listen to your country's cry;
Onward to the field.
But, this year, I am really retreating. I live on the border of Notting Hill and Bayswater, and I am escaping from the Carnival, which will literally come up to my door. It is horrible. The original meaning of this carnival, to unite the immigrant communities, is gone. It is money and sex, sex and money.
The Notting Hill Carnival is the largest in Europe. It has never been connected to a feast day, such as the carnivals for Mardi Gras or Epiphany. It is purely secular. Many of the locals have left for the weekend. The rubbish skips have gone since yesterday. I cannot even empty my garbage. All the parking is highly restricted, which it is anyway in this area. I can hear steel bands in the night....it is all surreal.
I am retreating. I shall blog, but lightly. Perhaps I shall do three posts instead of six. And, JonathanCatholic has graciously written two posts for me so that I can retreat.
Otherwise, I would feel like James Bowie or Davy Crockett at the Alamo.
Here is poem for the heck of it from the newspaper, the Telegraph and Texas Register, August 9, 1836.
The Texan Marseillaise.
Texians, to your banner fly,
Texians, now your valor try,
Listen to your country's cry;
Onward to the field.
Armed in perfect panoply,
Marshaled well our ranks must be:
Strike the blow for liberty,
Make the tyrant yield.
Marshaled well our ranks must be:
Strike the blow for liberty,
Make the tyrant yield.
Who is he that fears his power?
Who is he that dreads the hour?
Who is he would basely cower?
Let him flee for life.
Who is he that dreads the hour?
Who is he would basely cower?
Let him flee for life.
Who is he that ready stands
To fight for Texas and her lands?
Him his country now commands,
Onward, to the strife.
To fight for Texas and her lands?
Him his country now commands,
Onward, to the strife.
Small in number is our host,
But our cause is nobly just:
God of battles is our trust
In the dread affray.
But our cause is nobly just:
God of battles is our trust
In the dread affray.
I want to praise...
Posted by
Supertradmum
...all my Catholic single friends. I am so happy to know so many women and men who are single because they are Catholic. What do I mean?
I think of David, who is trying to find the right, traditional woman, who wants to be good trad husband and have children. Bravo, David, you have kept your standards, being honest and true to yourself and your goals.
I think of A, who is a Third Order Dominican, a highly intelligent career woman, who longs for a trad Catholic man and children, but suffers because she has chosen not to settle for less, choosing to be chaste and good.
I think of T, who loves children and cooking and is one of the most beautiful women I know. She is always thinking of others. She has chosen chastity and the vision of a real Catholic family. She waits, like A, and in that they are to be commended. They are single because they are holy and want a husband who will walk into Eternal Life with them.
I think of V, another career woman, who wanted all her life to be married. She always does the right thing. She is wise and good. She prays, she suffers in her loneliness, but follows the Ten Commandments.
I think of F. who works so hard in missionary work. She would love to be a wife, but no one has found her.
I think of M, who hates living alone, but keeps busy, thinks, and prays for others, does the little things that no one notices. She also will not compromise her Faith or morals.
I praise all my single friends because they are single BECAUSE they love God and His Laws, because they know they want a traditional Catholic marriage, because they are beautiful people.
Because you are good and true, you are single. Because you are virtuous, you are single. Because you love Mary, Our Mother, you are single. Because you love the Tridentine Mass, you are single.
I have used the phrase "Trust and Wait" on this blog many times. I got it from The Count of Monte Cristo.
Trust and Wait. I know you shed tears. I know you suffer. Trust and Wait.
God loves you all so very much.
In stories, there is knowledge and healing...
Posted by
Supertradmum
I just watched Princess Mononoke again, which is one of my favourite animes. The story is intriguing for many reasons. One reason is that the hero and heroine are complex, modern, and yet portray universal traits, necessary for fairy stories, which it basically is. I do not like the dubbed version, preferring the original.
The very young hero is named Ashitaka, a prince, of course, as he must come from noble background and appeal to the universal desire for knights in shining armour. But, he is cursed by killing a demon in order to save his people and he must go on a quest to fulfil his doom and, we hope, be healed. I am not going to spoil the story if readers have not seen it.
The girl with whom he falls in love is a typical wild, wolf-girl; a character found in many stories across the globe, and of course, she is a princess. Her name is San. But, she has the old story of a foundling, one of the most ancient oft fairy tale plots in the world. We are like orphan,s who have been found.
So far, East meets West in symbolism and appeal. What I like about the story is the plot which involves a keen understanding of human nature, and the fact that imperfection must become perfect. Again, I shall not spoil the ending, but a type of perfection is achieved--not quite.
It is a story of love and healing, sacrifice and bravery. Good stuff. It is very Christian, and the Japanese anime movies of this ilk tend to pursue Western and well as Eastern themes of fall and redemption. One of my other favourites, which I have mentioned on this blog is Gankutsuou, which is physically beautiful as well as profoundly "Christian". (But the book is better).
This movie is not for young children, as it is scary and too violent, and involves demons and spirits of another religious view, fine for older ones, but not the young. However, children need stories of failure and redemption. It is our story, as humans, starting in the Garden of Eden. And, we have a happy ending, because of the Passion and Death of Christ. The Resurrection brings us new life.
The human spirit reaches out for such stories. May these types of productions never stop being produced. We need them.
Trying to find intelligent commentary on Irish politics
Posted by
Supertradmum
I have been reading the Irish Times on-line for one eight months. Can anyone recommend a decent news source from Eire which is not embarrassingly stupid? I would like to read some intelligent commentary on Irish politics. Suggestions, please.
I guess anarchists read
Posted by
Supertradmum
A man from Spain and I were discussing anarchists in Europe, and I was trying to convince him they were organized. He just could not believe it. He does not read much on-line. Well, he should. And, anarchists read, as well as have blogs,websites and international organisations. Catholics ignore these groups at their own peril. Chaos can be organized.
I find it somewhat droll that there is an annual anarchist book fair in London and it is on a university campus. One can buy pink anarchist tee-shirts for the ladies and baby blue for the men. Am I missing something here?
Maybe this sounds odd to you or maybe not, but what is an important university doing hosting an annual anarchist book fair? Are we so blasé to think there must not be support for anarchy at Queen Mary's, University of London? Maybe I am not tolerant enough.
In case you think these are just students having a good time, here are the main principles and goals from the website:
The Anarchist Federation is an organisation of class struggle anarchists (based in Britain and Ireland, but with many contacts overseas) which aims to abolish Capitalism and all oppression to create a free and equal society. This is Anarchist Communism.
We see today's society as being divided into two main opposing classes: the ruling class which controls all the power and wealth, and the working class which the rulers exploit to maintain this. By racism, sexism and other forms of oppression, as well as war and environmental destruction the rulers weaken and divide us. Only the direct action of working class people can defeat these attacks and ultimately overthrow capitalism.
As the capitalist system rules the whole world it's destruction must be complete and world wide. We reject attempts to reform it such as working through parliament and national liberation movements (like the IRA) as they fail to challenge capitalism itself. Unions also work as a part of the capitalist system, so although workers struggle within them, they will be unable to bring about capitalism's destruction unless they go beyond these limits.
Organisation is vital if we're to beat the bosses, so we work for a united anarchist movement and are affiliated to the International of Anarchist Federations.
Thursday, 23 August 2012
Do the British and Americans Care about the Coptic Christians?
Posted by
Supertradmum
Youm-7, one of Egypt’s popular secular media that was recently attacked by Muslim Brotherhood supporters, reports that at least seventeen Christian bookstores in Shubra, one of Cairo’s largest districts, are under threat for selling Christian icons and statues. The storeowners, who are “in panic,” say they received threat letters by mail demanding that they stop selling their “idolatry.”
Among other things, the letters, copies of which were presented to Youm-7, say “We warn you Nassara [Koran’s derogatory term for Christians] to cease your foul trade, whereby you sell filthy idols.”
Accordingly, the bookshop owners rushed to the police stations to file reports in the hopes that the identities of those sending such letters be revealed. The report concludes by saying not much has been done to secure the stores and that only one security agent has been sent to patrol, and only during morning hours.
Feast of St. Rose of Lima
Posted by
Supertradmum
Today is the Feast of St. Rose of Lima. She is one of those rare saints who was canonized within the living memory of many who knew her. She died in 1617 and was canonized in 1671.
Today is special to me as Rose of Lima is my Confirmation name and she is one of my personal patrons.
(Supertradmum-Rose of Lima; lol)
This week in August marks one of my favourite times of the year. I love St Bernard of Clairvaux, and of course, St. Pius X. Today is Rose's day and yesterday, we honoured Our Lady as Queen. Within the week, we celebrate SS. Monica and Augustine. We shall also see the feasts of the Beheading of John the Baptist, SS. Margaret Clitherow, Anne Line and Margaret Ward by the end of next week celebrated.
And, there are more. August is a month of great saints. Let us rejoice and be glad.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)