Recent Posts

Showing posts with label philosophy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label philosophy. Show all posts

Monday, 24 August 2015

A Re-Post from Another Blog: Rethinking The New Evangelization



Supertradmum on The Guild of Blessed Titus Brandsma

    Sunday, 25 August 2013

Rethinking The New Evangelization

The call to new evangelization cannot be a static one. As Catholics, we have a duty to know our audience, 
our target groupings. And, I am convinced we are not addressing the youth of today in the mode which they need.

Too often, evangelization either is too banal, that is, watered down to the lowest common denominator; 
or it is an attempt to bring people out of serious sin by attacking the sins; or it is the speaking of Jesus as 
Saviour again outside of context of the larger perspective of what is means to be human and what it 
means to know a particular God.

I have been thinking about St. Augustine and his importance to our Catholic world today. He wrote in a similar 
time-the great destruction of a civilization which had endured for hundreds of years. He also bought a philosophical 
approach to all that chaos.

The Hebrews experienced much the same situation over and over and over. Either they were destroying old 
civilizations, or their own was being destroyed by whatever conqueror was the most powerful.

The reason for my ruminations is that we need, desperately, Catholic minds which can stop addressing the moral 
questions, stop addressing the ethical questions, and go back further to the basic questions of the existence of God 
and the nature of what it is to be human.

Now, obviously, we need the ethical discussion, so prominent among good Thomists, as Aquinas, like Aristotle, 
who dealt with vice, virtue, law and so on, but the world we are dealing with now is one of agnosticism and 
atheism. Those people deserve better discussions than what we have been able to give. Starting with morals 
is not the way to converse with atheists or agnostics, who lack a moral structure and may not even believe in one, 
except relativism. 

There are few great Catholic minds which can address the basic questions youth ask today. Here are a few of 
those questions. 

Is there a God?

What would be the meaning of being human?

What is the relationship between men and God?

Why are we here?

Do you ever doubt?

Why do you want to be a Catholic?

Augustine wrote his City of God in direct response to pagans, agnostics, and even atheists who were blaming 
Catholics for the fall of Rome. Hey, folks, this will happen again and I do not see the bright spark, a new Augustine, 
who can address the entire question of the nature of man, the City of God and the secular city in terms of basic 
principles. Phenomenology is too personalistic for this discussion. We need to revisit the Greeks, the Romans, 
all part of our heritage. We need to go back to the basics, or we shall continue to lose yet another generation.

Apologetics has been so slanted towards ethics, towards morality, that it has set aside the first principles. 
As humans and as Catholics, we must be able to discuss metaphysics at this level. Aristotle, Aquinas, 
the neo-Thomists, even educators, such as Montessori, all of whom are part of my mindset, my history, 
used the scientific method of rational discourse.


This is no longer accepted by many, and we cannot meet physicists, politicians, academics of any kind with 
language they no longer accept.

We must go back further. And, I do not mean Duns Scotus, who was more popular than Aquinas for a very long 
time. Nominalism is limited as well. We must go back and ask the basic questions of believing, of the 
supernatural, of God Himself. 

We must evangelize at this level, and not merely the moral or ethical one.

Those Millennials who ask the basic questions have no framework for morality because they have no philosophical 
framework. Benedict, the Pope Emeritus, was the man of the time, reminding us that Augustine was not only a 
theologian, but a philosopher. We need to look at him again in that light, and at those Doctors of the Church who 
helped the Church develop doctrine from the basic principles.

The reason we must think in different terms is that we are witnessing the chaos of the death of Western Civilization 
and to speak in any terms purely from moral or ethical viewpoints will not speak to the hearts of those completely 
at a loss, at sea in chaos.

That is what the Muslims do - speak only in ideological, so-called moral terms. This type of approach does not 
to the very essence of who a person is and who God is. Imposing law without the reasons for such begs the 
question of religion.

I read and hear too many high-ranking priests, bishops, theologians, especially moral theologians, who do not 
have the proper perspective of the problem of basic principles, because their own training was so limited. 
Try and find excellent philosophers in seminaries who are orthodox and can engage at this level of thinking.

When one answers the questions of who man is and Who God is, then the moral and ethical questions fall 
into place

I hope God raises up some great metaphysical minds in this era. I hope and pray that both clergy and laity can learn 
to evangelize from basic principles. 

Tuesday, 9 June 2015

Eastern vs. Western Philosophy


I cannot sufficiently cover this topic on a blog, as one could teach an entire college semester course on the comparisons between Eastern and Western philosophies.

Some people who are Catholic do not care about philosophy, as they do not understand that how we think, the method of thinking and the basis for thinking must precede moral decisions as well as theology. This forms one of the reasonings behind all seminarians being required to take philosophy before they take theology.

Even if I use the simple, wiki definition of philosophy, one can see how this study involves most aspects of both the material and spiritual life.

Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental problems, such as those connected with realityexistenceknowledgevalues,reasonmind and language

In a discussion with someone about Tai-Chi, the problem of interpretation of so-called arts, whether military or not, from the East, must involve a discussion of the philosophy behind activities.

Yes, Eastern philosophies are not compatible with Western views of reality, existence, knowledge, values, reason, the mind and language.

Obviously, unless one understands that philosophical ideas created an invisible thread tying together religion and all aspects of life, one will fall into either cynicism or New Age fantasies regarding life.

God created Western Civilization through Revelation and the cultures of Judaic, Greek and Roman peoples. God, in His Wisdom, could have created His plan for reaching Him through other philosophies, but He did not. There are complicated reasons for understanding that our religion of Catholicism, although originating in the Middle East, is absolutely not an "Eastern Religion".

How we think about ourselves and the world around us determines how we worship God. God demands that we worship Him in spirit and truth, not in fallacies or confusion about the material world.

The more one accepts Eastern religions and even alternative medicines, the more one moves away from the revealed truth from God as found in the Scriptures, and in Catholic Tradition.

Remember, confusion is never from God, never.

More on this later...I am going out for a bit.