Tuesday, 7 October 2014
This is short rant. I have written before on the different vocations a young, or not so young, man may face.
After reading some comments on Fr. Z. last week, it was clear to me that there is still some confusion as to how a man can approach a bishop on becoming a diocesan priest.
First of all, some Catholics do not understand that a call to the FSSPs or the Institute of Christ the King is a call to a religious order, not to the diocesan, or, as it is sometimes called, secular priesthood.
Second, most dioceses only accept men who either have been born in that diocese or have lived and worked in that diocese for years. Switching dioceses is rare. My cousin who is a priest did so, as an older vocation, being forced to leave a liberal seminary, but finding recourse in the neighboring diocese. He is a happy and an excellent priest. But, the second diocese did not have to accept him.
The rule usually is if a person leaves or is kicked out of one diocese, that man is not accepted in another.
To think that a man can "shop" around for a diocese like going to a college is absolutely wrong. Going into the seminary is not at all like getting into a college or university. It is much more challenging and difficult.
|thanks to wikimedia for Abram and Sarai|
I was in a very large metropolitan area, attending a TLM and then going to the coffee afterwards. I had an experience only endured one other time in another land far away.
After one of these odd experiences, I spoke with a TLM priest, a rather famous one in some parts, about my encounter with men of certain kind. He said he had noticed this type of perversion of the marriage relationship in other communities as well.
These men were out of a different planet. I call them the "muktarmen" "Muktarmen" are men who treat their wives like children. They are men who do not understand the sacrament of marriage and who do not understand the place of the wife as "helpmate", equal in person-hood with a different role in the marriage.
I was talking with several people around a coffee table in a large parish with hundreds of people at the TLM. As usual, I began speaking with the couples sitting around with their young children.
Two men made it very clear that I should not have been talking to the men, but only the women. I was mildly bemused, but then watched how they treated their wives. They treated their wives, even in public, as children.
This type of misunderstanding among trad men involves a mindset that women are not equal to men. They micromanage the home, not giving the wife the rule of the house, as is her role, in shopping, cooking, cleaning, decorating, and even doing the chequebook.
Some of them do not let their wives join any groups except those attach to the Church. and worse, as one wife of one of the muktarmen told me, the daughters do not have to go to college or learn any skills for the outside world because muktarman wants them all to get married.
I was so upset after encountering these couples that I spoke to a TLM priest about this phenomenon of the muktarmen. He admitted he had met this before and was thinking of addressing this somehow, but that it was a tricky subject in his parish.
How did this false subjection of wives to their husbands happen? How is it that muktarmen never learned what a wife really is-the person who will help them get to heaven and who frequently is given great wisdom for the family. She is the one who raises their children to be saints mostly.
Older women are there to impart wisdom to the younger and share experience with all. Catholic men have lost respect for older women, older wives, as well.
No children in those families will ever learn to respect their mothers. In fact, the boys will grow up not respecting women but expecting them to be children.
Too many men look for "child-wives", women who will not challenge them, who will not be a real helpmate.
Muktarmen were dads of some girls I taught years ago. They pushed down any desire in their daughters for college or learning a skill. This is shocking, and in my opinion, child abuse.
Muktarmen do not see their wives either as spiritual helpers or even spiritually superior when these wives are saints.
Muktarmen are control freaks. I have a rule of thumb about muktarmen. If they are in the kitchen everyday following the wife around and not letting her get on in her domain, not just on the weekends when normal men may pitch and and help mom with by giving her a break, they are muktarmen.
I learned in my clan growing up that the woman was queen of the house. Dads were the kings who expected the queen to keep everything in order and trusted the queen to get on with making a happy home to which he could come home from fighting the knightly battles in the world.
My mother's generation had much responsibility.
Marriage is about interdependence.
Marriage is about mutual trust and respect.
A man has children with his wife and entrusts their spiritual life to both himself and her.
Mothers are most important in the formation of children, and, therefore, are given huge responsibilities.
What happened? From where does this demeaning of women come?
Zelie Martin had her own business even after she was married.
St. Etheldreda was the authority over the prior in a double monastery, as were several other female saints.
Women in the Catholic Church should be encouraged to be strong in their spheres--and not helpless, not dependent for everything from a man.
If a woman is in a position is a marriage where she must ask for spending money or is getting an allowance, something is wrong, very wrong.
God called women in the Bible to do great, heroic deeds. Are they allowed to do so, to be leaders, to be among wise men?
I quote the Scriptures and notice all the things this fair wife does: