Recent Posts

Showing posts with label Catholic Men. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholic Men. Show all posts

Monday, 13 April 2015

Hmmmm Need some statistics...

I decided to do a pictorial study of whether more men attended Mass pre-Vatican II. As there are no hard statistics to be found, I thought at least photos would reveal something.

Let me start with the famous 1959 painting by Rockwell. "Sunday Morning"--pre-Vat. II.



Mexicans worshipping without priests, 1926



Wedding, 1947



Wedding, 1930s


Coming out of Mass, 1930s



Wedding, 1950




Wedding, 1950






Wedding, 1960


Special Mass, 1958 with priests and sems, check out laity




Mass, 1950s




And just for the heck of it, a Lutheran church, 1930s

Thursday, 9 April 2015

Re-posts for the times..by the sword divided

Satan divides. Most of the families with whom I am familiar, including my own, are divided on issues of religion, morality, political ethics. Some of us are the only practicing Catholics among our siblings. Some have parents who have fallen away into heresy and compromise. Many parents have children and grandchildren who have left the Church, or who have refused baptism and confirmation. The names of these people would fill several pages of intercession, just for my prayer time.This state of division in families is not new. I repeat an older post. It is not comforting, but it is the truth of what we all are experiencing today, April 9, 2015.The sword of truth divides.Prayer, fasting, becoming perfect, mortification---the answers. But, all men and women have free will. Remember that you may not be the person to bring your family members back to Christ and His Church. Pray for someone to enter their lives to do this. Be humble, but firm. Friday, 23 August 2013

Musings on treachery



I have been, in the past few weeks, pursuing a personal study on the Civil War in England, as well as the times immediately leading up to the killing of a rightful king.

Now, what has always intrigued and concerned me were the families divided by religion and politics. I have written about this briefly here, http://guildofblessedtitus.blogspot.ie/2013/08/by-press-divided.html, but want to share some thoughts which will apply to us Catholics today, August 23, 2013.

That religion, Catholic, Anglican, and Calvinist loyalties led to warfare, demonstrates the deeply held beliefs of those involved.



That families were ripped apart by religion is also a fact. To this day, there are Catholic and Protestant branches of the same family existing in England, Scotland, Ireland and America. I have met people of Catholic branches in England, who have long-lost cousins of the same name in certain states in America, and these American families came over as Protestants.


The hatred and persecution by the Anglicans and Calvinists of the Catholics form the stuff of history, the stories of the Tyburn Martyrs, the heroic tales of St. Thomas More, St. John Fisher, St. Oliver Plunkett, and so on. The age of the martyrs turned into the age of civil war.

The fact that some people changed sides reveals the sad stories of betrayal and treachery.

But, there was and still is, a third category of people, who were the new men and women of the 16th and 17th centuries. These were the people who left religion entirely, became cynics, and merely worked for their own status, careers, comfort. These men and women were the moderns, those self-centred ones whose only principle was me, me, me.

These opportunists spawned further generations of non-believers, who outwardly conformed, but whose souls were impervious to the interior spiritual life.

In the days to come of persecution and testing, we shall see Catholics betraying Catholics, Catholics becoming cynics, and seizing opportunities for advancement, building their little kingdoms on the backs of those whom they betray.

We cannot kid ourselves, dear Catholic readers, Christ has prepared us for this.

And a man’s enemies shall be they of his own household. Matthew 10:36 DR

In the coming days, which side will you be on--the real Catholics, the schismatic Catholics, or the cynics? Will you be Cavaliers, Roundheads, or opportunists?


Monday, 19 January 2015

Repost because of a famous blog topic

Thursday, 28 November 2013

How To Create a Peter Pan


Many women with whom I speak have discussed with me the number of men who are not acting like men, but like boys. Many reasons have created this huge group of Peter Pans. Sadly, I know that many women are not able to follow the call of marriage and raising children because of the lack of the Protector Males.

I have many posts on Peter Pans, Protectors and Predators-just follow the tags.

However, I have been thinking about why there are so many Peter Pans.

I can share, after some observation and thought, how to create a Peter Pan.

1) Never allow your sons to learn how to do any work around the house. Do not let them learn how to cook, or use tools, or do garden work.

2) Never allow your male children to endure suffering. Coddle them, feel sorry for them, and give in to their weaknesses.

3) Never make your sons work without pay.

4) Be rude and mean to women, including your wife, if you are the husband. This creates Peter Pans.

5) If you are the mom, treat your sons like your husband instead of like sons. They will never grow up respecting women, which is a sign of a Peter Pan. They will want to marry moms instead of helpmates.

6) Never allow your sons to fail and then to get up and try again.

7) Never allow your sons to do hard things on their own,. Micro-management creates Peter Pans.

8) Let them watch lots of tv and do lots of gaming. Let your sons think that entertainment is more important than work. Peter Pans do not learn to work.

9) Never protect your wife and daughters. If you do, you will be making a Protector Son, instead of a Peter Pan.

10) Always shield your sons from physical pain of any sort. Of course, Peter Pans never learn to deal with physical pain.

Maybe some dads who are readers will not like to do these things and will honestly raise sons to be Protectors.

My female friends and I would be astounded! I am sure that TLM and home schooling parents create Protectors.

What do you think?

Monday, 15 September 2014

Duh!

It finally dawned on me today why all the leaders of nations are denying that the wars in the Middle East have anything to do with religion. This is a daily denial of reality.

Reason: if they admitted that Islam was violent, which they do not, they would have to admit the Catholic Church was right all along regarding Vienna, Lepanto, etc., which these seculars do not want to do.

So, in continually denying the reality of Truth and the possibility of true and false religions, they deny what is obvious.

I call this stupidity.

Leaders from almost all Western nations are in denial about the reality of violence, or peace because of religions views.

Of course, religion could not possibly be that important.

Duh! Well, I was not concerned about denials until I sat down this morning and looked at the multitude of denials in the past several days.

Now, denial is epidemic.

Where are the real leaders, the real men?

Sunday, 17 August 2014

Will Catholics Wake Up?

Nadhim Zahawi, a Conservative MP who was visiting northern Iraq late last week, said that Islamic State fighters had been caught carrying a season ticket for Liverpool Football Club and a gym card from Ealing.
He said that local forces estimated that between “500 and 750 fighters have joined the Islamic caliphate from the United Kingdom”.
Rory Stewart MP, the Tory chairman of the defence select committee who was also in Iraq, said Islamic State was now a “significant threat”.
He added: “We have been complacent. This has been developing a long time. In some ways these people have been in Mosul for two and a half years and we worked up to it about two and a half months ago.
“We ignored them when they were developing in eastern Syria, we ignored them when they took Fallujah in January.  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/11039214/Our-generational-struggle-against-a-poisonous-ideology.html

Almost wake up time...almost. The only thing strong enough against a false religion is the True Religion of Catholicism. The cultures wars and the military wars are being lost for the lack of grace and holiness among Christians. http://www.uec.eu/12_September_1683.html

The Blessed Virgin Mary interceded at both the Siege of Vienna and the Battle of Lepanto, which is why we celebrate her victories on two days-September 12 and October 7th.  She also had a victory on the Feast Day of Our Lady of Snows.


Secularists think they can win this war with the code of decency and humanitarianism. But those traits, even virtues, come from somewhere. These come with a heart centered on the Trinity; the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.

Secularized Catholics, who no longer see right and wrong, but only grey, and who do not honor Mary Our Mother, also do not understand how we can defeat violence.

Prayer and action, prayer and fasting...how few do this now.


Friday, 8 August 2014

It Is Not The Role of The Layman

to be a pacifist....why have the the post-WWII generations lost their nerve, their heart. If you do not want to fight physically, go to a monastery, or be a priest, and fight spiritually.


http://www.anglicannews.org/news/2014/08/anglican-vicar-of-baghdad-%E2%80%9Cchild-i-baptised-cut-in-half-by-isis%E2%80%9D.aspx

How can Western nations stand by and watch this? Where are the Men of the West?



God forgive the men of this generation, who are afraid, because they have turned against You, O Lord. Renew their hearts and minds and souls in you, O God.

From Justin Welby on the site above...

“The international community must document human rights abuses being committed in northern Iraq so that future prosecutions can take place. It is important and necessary for the international community to challenge the culture of impunity which has allowed these atrocities to take place.
“With the world’s attention on the plight of those in Iraq, we must not forget that this is part of an evil pattern around the world where Christians and other minorities are being killed and persecuted for their faith. Only this week I received an email from a friend in Northern Nigeria about an appalling attack on a village, where Christians were killed because of their faith in Jesus Christ. Such horrific stories have become depressingly familiar in countries around the world, including Syria, South Sudan and the Central African Republic.
“We must continue to cry to God for peace and justice and security throughout the world. Those suffering such appalling treatment in Iraq are especially in my prayers at this time.”
Other Christian leaders have also spoken up about the situation in Iraq including Roman Catholics, who, in England and Wales, have designated Sunday, 9 August, as a Day of Prayer for Christians in Iraq. The Syrian Orthodox Patriarch yesterday wrote to the UN, following an emergency meeting of Patriarchs, calling on the UN Security Council to “fulfil their responsibilities in stopping this genocide”.

Catholics, Ordinariates, join in this day of prayer. But, Laymen, do more than pray. There is not enough anger. Is there no man who cares?

Friday, 25 July 2014

Where Are The Men of The West?

What happened?

How is it that Catholic men have forgotten that to fight evil is to FIGHT evil? Do people think that evil is going to just go away and leave us Catholics alone? Do people do not realize that satan hates the Church and has legions of people under him on earth who hate the Church?

There are three ways to fight evil. In this post, I address men

These are by joining a monastery, becoming a priest, or becoming a Church Militant layman.

The first group prays and fasts continually for the Church. These second group administers the sacraments on the spiritual battlefield. The third group takes the initiative and spreads the Gospel among people, and sometimes, actually fights.

For a baptized male, there are no other choices. One cannot shirk one's call to the Church Militatnt

We have now, three generations of peter pans, narcissists and passive men who would not fight a crusade if it landed on their doorsteps.

The emasculation of men began a long time ago, particularly in the 19th century, and in the early 20th century, when Catholic men stopped fighting evil.

There are evil people in this world. Women and children need defending. The Catholic Church needs defending.

Where are the real Men of the West? Are they cowering in fear? Just wait--it will get worse.

Has the day come when the bravery of the Men of the West has failed?

We have two feast days in the Catholic Church celebrating victories over evil.

September 12th and October 7th.

Think on your ancestors, Men of the West.

Think.


Wednesday, 2 July 2014

Christians are so weak...

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/07/islamic-state-caliph-calls-on-muslims-worldwide-to-move-to-his-new-caliphate-and-wage-jihad-against-infidels


 Look at my Men of the West posts...

Thursday, 24 April 2014

Alter Christus, Not Alter John Waynes


"A Bit Worried About Stereotypes" could be the subtitle of this post.

Priests from all times were not necessarily John Waynes. If one looks at the lives of the saints, many of the male saints were full of so-called feminine traits. I am thinking of the great Doctor of the Church, St. Bernard of Clairvaux, for one, whose long series of sermons on the Song of Songs, would not have been given without insights into courtly love. He could not have been the great saint he was without the attitude of love towards the Bridegroom. In fact, a saint has to come to the union with God in an intimate manner of receiving, not giving, which is the opposite of the normal masculine manner. Read St. John of the Cross as well.

St. Bernard was raised a nobleman and passed those traits on to his monks.

He was not afraid of conflict, either. He called the great crusade. There is in the life of a gentleman, times for fighting and times for singing.

Why do we make dichotomies when these might not exist?

I can think of saints like SS. Francis de Sales, Alphonsus, John Henry Newman, Francis Borgia, Louis IX and Edward I, who were gentle men and saints. To be a gentleman is a goal of all Catholic men, hopefully and discussed on this blog many times.

I think it is dangerous to stereotype men as if outward appearances or even traits define masculinity or femininity.

The great saints who wrote on Love, such as St. Augustine and St. Francis, may be passed by on the streets today as not the American notion of manly.

I have noticed over the years that English gentlemen are much more balanced in their masculinity than American men, on the whole. They have nothing to prove and are comfortable being men, yet intellectual and interested in the arts, as many American men think are "sissy" things to do and pursue.

St. Anselm re-introduced the Trivium and Quadrivium into the seminaries for several reasons. One was to stop the ordaining of uneducated men, and the other was to make sure priests were gentlemen, who knew how to identify the stars and planets, to sing and even to dance. They learned all the subjects of both those classical curricula for a reason-to become whole, mature men.

The priest represents God and is an alter Christus. He is not an alter John Wayne. The priest needs to be a protector male, of course, but of the Faith, of Truth, of the Body of Christ, of his flock. He does not need to know how to raise cattle or fix a toilet.

(Although I know one sem close to me who was trained by his mum to be a handy-man and does fix stuff, rip up carpet, sand and oil floors, as well as does gardening, cleaning, cooking, ironing, laundry and so on.)

The helpless male is not the type we want for either the priesthood or for marriage. But, one cannot ignore the need for the scholars, the artists, the singers and composers. In our cry for more men, we must not deny that even men have different talents to bring to the Church.

It is not merely a question of either masculine or feminine traits, but men who are mature in their own selves, in their identities. Too often the gifts of empathy and gentleness are seen as feminine. These are traits of Christ Himself. Alter Christus, not alter John Waynes, please....


Wednesday, 16 April 2014

Another painting of a real man


Wherefore to dignity and wisdom we must add
virtue, the proper fruit of them both. Virtue seeks
and finds Him who is the Author and Giver of all
good, and who must be in all things glorified;
otherwise, one who knows what is right yet fails
to perform it, will be beaten with many stripes
(Luke 12.47). Why? you may ask. Because he
has failed to put his knowledge to good effect,
but rather has imagined mischief upon his bed
(PS. 36.4); like a wicked servant, he has turned
aside to seize the glory which, his own
knowledge assured him, belonged only to his
good Lord and Master. It is plain, therefore, that
dignity without wisdom is useless and that
wisdom without virtue is accursed. But when one
possesses virtue, then wisdom and dignity are
not dangerous but blessed. Such a man calls on
God and lauds Him, confessing from a full heart,
'Not unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but unto Thy
name give glory' (PS. 115.1). Which is to say, 'O
Lord, we claim no knowledge, no distinction for
ourselves; all is Thine, since from Thee all things
do come.'

A painting of a real man....



St. Thomas More, defender of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the primacy of the pope, the truth of the Catholic Church as the one, true, holy, Catholic and apostolic Church.

Tying Two Themes Together

I have been reading the Pope Emeritus on the agnostic society we now have, and listening to Father Chad Ripperger on raising men.

I can put together two themes here. The agnostic is the peter pan. Those men, and I have heard this in my own family, who say "Catholicism is too hard" have fallen into being babies or have never been real men.

The agnostics avoid suffering. They choose the easy way out by not practicing the virtues and by avoiding responsibility.

Therefore, the peter pans frequently have no faith, are seculars, are caught in the flesh and the world.

Those men who do not grow up will not choose the hardest way, the way of martyrdom. Here are some thoughts from St. Thomas More.

"What men call fame is, after all, but a very windy thing. A man thinks that many are praising him, and talking of him alone, and yet they spend but a very small part of the day thinking of him, being occupied with things of their own."
"I will not mistrust [God], though I shall feel myself weakening and on the verge of being overcome with fear... I trust he shall place his holy hand on me and in the stormy seas hold me up from drowning."
"If any man marvel that God made all His creatures such as they should always need aid of His grace, let him know that God did it out of His double goodness. First, to keep them from pride by causing them to perceive their feebleness, and to call upon Him; and secondly to do His creatures honor and comfort."
"Often, actually very often, God allows his greatest servants to make the most humiliating mistakes."
"A man buys hell here with so much pain, that he might have heaven with less than one-half. Occupy your minds with good thoughts, or the enemy will fill them with bad ones. Unoccupied, they cannot be."
"If I am distracted, Holy Communion helps me to become recollected. If opportunities are offered by each day to offend my God, I arm myself anew each day for the combat by the reception of the Eucharist. If I am in special need of light and prudence in order to discharge my burdensome duties, I draw nigh to my Saviour and seek counsel and light from him." 

Please listen and pray about....

...the last posted two talks. These are serious meditations on themes on the blog, and see my themes in the tags.



Pain and suffering create maturity. Those boys who avoid or complain about such will not grow up to be a man.

More from The Holy Priest Ripperger


An important comment on the subsidiarity and control towards the end............

From One of My Favorite Priests Via Therese



How to raise a man.....

Tuesday, 8 April 2014

Repost On Manhood

Monday, 3 December 2012

Manners...the Lost Christian Legacy... and a Sign of Virtue in a Man


The sign of a protector male is that he is willing to suffer for another. Being mannerly can be a type of suffering as it is dying to self. Rudeness is egotism and narcissism. Predator men are rude-perhaps not at first-but the rudeness will reveal itself.

There are too many predator men and not enough protectors. Protectors have manners. One of the most delightful aspect of a truly Catholic man, who has given his life to God, is that he becomes more and more a protector. Hopefully, even if he has not learned manners at home, he acquires these. The old man, the Adam in him becomes the New Man, the Christ. Christ is the model for the protector. So is St. Joseph. Protectors are usually made so in families, but one can learn and change and become the kind of man God desires for His Kingdom. A protector wants to make a woman happy and peaceful. He wants to keep that woman happy and safe. That is a protector's goal.



I cannot imagine St. Francis or St. Francis de Sales being rude to a woman. I cannot imagine St. Edmund Campion or St. Maximilian 
Kolbe being rude to a woman. I cannot imagine Blessed Pier 
Giorgio Frassati being rude to anyone.

Such behavior as respect and manners, which may be called 
chivalry, is achieved and must be sought after. It is not necessarily natural to some men. If one is raised as a wolf cub in a cave, one 
must learn and achieve gentility. 

Sadly, some priests are very rude. I find this disconcerting and odd 
that a man who is set aside by God to be another Christ is rude and sometimes, specifically to women. I have witnessed this behaviour 
from priests towards people many times since being here in Eire. 
One of the most gentlemanly clerics I know has the last name of Knight. Do you think this is an accident?

OK, I am from a generation which learned manners. One learned to listen to others and share in conversations. As a woman, I expect men to help me with heavy packages and doors, 
as well as not walking 20 feet ahead of me on the street. Boys and girls in the 1960s in Catholics schools learned manners from the nuns. Even in high school, we had guidelines on dating manners, and in college, we had a 
course on "finishing". This sounds like the Jurassic Age to most, but I am concerned. I think the lack of manners
is causing a barbarism among the younger ones. Women who are traditional Catholics should be able to expect a higher degree of respect from their male counterparts.

Young women, do not settle for less. Do not go out, or date, rude men. They will only get worse. 
They are predators who only think of their own needs.

The cell phone is part of the problem. When I am talking with someone, it is very rude to me that the texting and messaging interrupts good conversation. Thankfully, some young people have been taught this is rude, but for the
vast majority, this is not the case.
I text maybe ten times a week and mostly on skype, rather than my phone number. I realize this is unthinkable for most teens and university students who talk on the phone hours by texting. To text while in a conversation with another is just plain rude.

I cannot be bothered and nothing is THAT important. Plus, if I want to talk with a friend, I try and meet up with them for coffee. That is called relating in the real world.

Texting is anti-social. Thankfully, when I was teaching, the colleges had rules about turning off cell-phones in the classrooms and if not, we instructors were allowed to put it in our syllabi, which I did . (My last teaching job ended in December of 2010).
But the lack of manners is serious. Catholic girls should not even 
think of dating a young man with bad manners. This is a serious 
problem reflecting a disrespect. Such small things as coughing and yawning without covering one's mouth, or talking with a mouth full of 
food, or not waiting for all to sit down to start eating form some of 
these criticisms. Fast food has ruined manners. Cursing is rude 
behavior, as well as sinful. In fact, if a man is living a virtuous life, 
he will not exhibit rudeness.

Not dressing for an occasion is rude as well. Jeans do not belong at Sunday Mass, and I notice even men older than myself wearing 
designer jeans at the TLM. I find this very odd. Do they not care how 
they look? They look like old hippies, even at the TLM. They are being rude to God, the Trinity.

I have noticed in Europe that there are certain groups of men whose manners are worse than others. Sadly, the Irish young men have 
horrible manners, but so do many older Irish men, even of my 
generation or older. The typical situation is a complete absence of the awareness of a real need of any woman. And, the roughness of 
speaking, which I have noticed, indicates a lack of gentility and respect. Some young Irish women have told me 
they would never marry an Irish man for some of these reasons. What has happened cannot be blamed on these 
girls and women from good families, which are used to manners.
I witness the lack of manners daily. Smoking in front of people without asking is a huge problem here. Where I come from, and in England, a person asks if it is fine to smoke in front of others. Not here. Also, men do not put a woman first in lines, or open doors, or allow a woman to walk on the pavement rather than the street. Even traditional Irish Catholic men lack manners. Coming from a background and class where manners are the rule of the day, I notice these things.

Some of the problems are ethnic. American men from the Mid-West are some of the most polite men in the world. So too are English men.
Some of the worst examples of a lack of manners are found in men from the Middle-East and Asia-except for the Japanese 
men I have met, who are very mannerly. I am sorry, but I have much experience in the world and this is a truism. Where there is not Christianity, there is more rudeness.

There are many old people walking on the streets and in 
Church. It pains me to see them struggle without help. Even ancient women who are alone are no longer helped with doors, 
or even noticed. I try to help when I can. I see these old women and old men, as well, standing in buses. I give them my seat. 
It is a sign of decadence that the old are not honored. The old 
are invisible to the young. This is not Christianity.

My concern is the growing brutality towards women which 
goes unnoticed. The attacks in Cairo and others places during 
the recent demonstrations indicate a growing hatred of women. The experiences of some students regarding their ex-boyfriends is another. There are too many violent men. Violence can be demonstrated in body language and words as well. Rudeness
is a type of violence. Listen to how people speak to one another. It makes me sad.
I believe the age of chivalry is long gone, and I believe that unless a man is dedicated to honour and love Mary, a Catholic young woman should not give him the time of day, as we say in the States.

The Blessed Mother conquered Europe, and civilized men through their devotion to her. Most men who have this devotion are mannerly, polite and respectful. Without a love of the Queen of Heaven and Earth in his heart, a man is not an entire man.

I praise those men who love Mary.The difference is obvious. What I do not understand are the Irish men who pray the rosary and are very rude. I just do not understand. Three men were rude yesterday while praying the rosary, or in line at church. Amazing, rudeness in church. Men have slipped into selfish preoccupation with the man's own comfort. Men have lost the ability to be uncomfortable and suffer for the sake of another.

Accepting and absorbing suffering is a sign of a mature man, a gentleman and a protector.

Piety and devotion mean nothing if the inner person is not changed. Such things become superstitions if not connected to the daily examination of conscience.

Chivalry crossed national boundaries at one time. Ethnicity made no difference. There was a nobility of mind and 
heart which changed the course of history. Europe has lost this awareness and desire for gentility. We are 
becoming, and are already in some areas, barbarians.

I shall quote Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman again on this subject. Mothers, teach your children. Fathers, 
honor the wife and mother of your children. This is how they learn.

A Definition of a Gentleman

It is almost a definition of a gentleman to say he is one who never 
inflicts pain. This description is both refined and, as far as it goes,
 accurate. He is mainly occupied in merely removing the obstacles 
which hinder the free and unembarrassed action of those about him; 
and he concurs with their movements rather than takes the initiative
 himself. His benefits may be considered as parallel to what are 
called comforts or conveniences in arrangements of a personal 
nature: like an easy chair or a good fire, which do their part in 
dispelling cold and fatigue, though nature provides both means of 
rest and animal heat without them. The true gentleman in like 
manner carefully avoids whatever may cause a jar or a jolt in the minds of those with whom he is cast; — 
all clashing of opinion, or collision of feeling, all restraint, or suspicion, or gloom, or resentment; his great concern 
being to make every one at their ease and at home. He has his eyes on all his company; he is tender towards the
 bashful, gentle towards the distant, and merciful towards the absurd; he can recollect to whom he is speaking; he
 guards against unseasonable allusions, or topics which may irritate; he is seldom prominent in conversation, and 
never wearisome. He makes light of favours while he does them, and seems to be receiving when he is conferring. 
He never speaks of himself except when compelled, never defends himself by a mere retort, he has no ears for 
slander or gossip, is scrupulous in imputing motives to those who interfere with him, and interprets every thing for 
the best. He is never mean or little in his disputes, never takes unfair advantage, never mistakes personalities or 
sharp sayings for arguments, or insinuates evil which he dare not say out. From a long-sighted prudence, he 
observes the maxim of the ancient sage, that we should ever conduct ourselves towards our enemy as if he were 
one day to be our friend. He has too much good sense to be affronted at insults, he is too well employed to 
remember injuries, and too indolent to bear malice. He is patient, forbearing, and resigned, on philosophical
principles; he submits to pain, because it is inevitable, to bereavement, because it is irreparable, and to death,
 because it is his destiny. If he engages in controversy of any kind, his disciplined intellect preserves him from the
 blunder. 
From 
The Idea of a University, 1852

Tuesday, 25 March 2014

(I rarely disagree with Voris but) Original Sin is the Sin of Adam


The women's liberation movement is indeed evil. But, the feminization of men happened much earlier than the 1960s. The great storm of forty years ago was a result of the emasculation of men which had happened as early as three generations before 1960.

What weakened men over the centuries was not the uprising of women in the '60s and '70s, but the result of two world wars and the selfishness of the new generations of peter pans.

If one looks at the history of the family, the male leadership of the family became undermined at the latest in World War I.  The First World War killed off the old aristocracy.  The First World War killed off thousands of good Catholic men..

The best and the brightest men of Europe were killed in that unnecessary war. The cream of the crop of men from all the European nations died going over the trenches.

The Jazz Age revealed a "Lost Generation" of men who acted like peter pans, refusing to get married and playing until they died. Contraception grew up in the 1920s and 1930s. In fact, the Anglican Church approved contraception at the 1930 Lambeth Council. The men who were marrying and not marrying could be Christians and expect women to contracept.

Men took the lead at the Lambeth Council. Men decided on contraception there, and in the other Protestant denominations.

In 1970, the Presbyterian church allowed contraception and abortion.

In 1970, the Lutheran Church of America accepted contraception and abortion.

In 1977, the UCC accepted both.

Except for the Presbyterians, there were no female "clergy" at these times.

All these decisions came from men, who were voting to destroy the family.

One of the missing ingredients in those who blame the feminist movement for such evils is this history and the fact that many men came back from both World War I and World War II not wanting anything to do with discipline or authority. Peter pans existed a plenty in the 1960s.

The generation of peter pans grew up in the 1902s and 1930s first. Many women in that age group failed to find strong men as husbands, as the damage was done earlier. Boys were not trained to be like their fathers, or worse, they rebelled against strong fathers, leaving the women without protectors. This pattern repeated itself in the 1950s aand 1960s. How many dads told their daughters not to wear mini-skirts, or not to be out late; not to go to pubs, or not to date weak men? Few...very few dads really were involved in their daughters' lives in these times.  Dads no longer looked out for suitable mates for their girls, letting females fend for themselves in this important decision. Few brothers watched out for the good of their sisters, instead, not growing up themselves, not taking responsibility in being protectors.

Women were rebelling against weak men, as well as those who abused their roles in the families. Did satan jump in and push the feminist agenda? Of course.  But, the evil began with the abdication of men as real leaders in the family and in the Church.

To blame women is like Adam blaming Eve. It is not the sin of Eve for which we and Christ Himself suffered, but the sin of Adam, who refused to take responsibility for his own mate.

And, can we not see that the weakness of the clergy before Vatican II LED to Vatican II?  The crisis in leadership had hit the Church earlier than the feminist movement. Those who think that the priests who were ordained in the 1950s did not contain in their ranks those who wanted to protestantize and liberalize the Church should look at the members of the committees. I have had priests in their 80s tell me that they became priests in order to make the Church more protestant. They succeeded.

The fact is that there was a leadership crisis in the Church from the 1930s, of those who wanted to have a Pan-Christian church. This ideal of false ecumenism came out of the fear of communism and fascism, but created a modernist mind-set which directly fed into the changes we see among Catholics today.

Men controlled the Church in the 1930s, not women, and these men were modernists and followers of the heresy of Americanism. The rot had set in much earlier than 1960.

Think again. If Adam had not accepted Eve's sin, there would be no Original Sin.

Men, start taking responsibility for your own lack of manhood and stop blaming the Eves of this world.

Adam's cowardice is the cowardice of all men who do not take responsibility for history.

Wednesday, 26 February 2014

The Age of The Laity Is Not A Liberal Trend

It seems ironic to me that men in families, even fathers, continue the "blame-game" towards priests, laying all the evils of the Church at the feet of the clerical shepherds. There has been a demise of the Church Militant among men.

The lay shepherds truly must face the fact that they have been part of the weakening of the Church as well. The "blame game" needs to start in the home. 

Over and over, I have tried to encourage the laity to see that the call of the Holy Spirit in this age of the laity is a real call, not a liberal trend. God knew from all time the weaknesses, the sins of the clergy which would happen in these times, and led the Church to emphasize the role of the laity. There is a reason for this. Just as Pope Francis wants more emphasis on the local Church, so too, we must have a mindset of building up the local Church.

We may very well not have clergy in our parishes, or even in our dioceses. I wrote a long time ago that dioceses may disappear, totally.

We must rise to this challenge, and stop moaning and complaining about bad clerical shepherds.

There are just as many, if not more, bad lay shepherds.

We have witnessed the collapse of the protector lay shepherd.

That churches will close, that schools have compromised the Faith, that liberal Catholics have seized the centers of catechesis is not merely a problem of the clergy, but of the laity.

That men complain of too many women in chancery offices. Stop complaining and get the degrees necessary to work in these offices.  Decide to let your family live more simply in order for the wage-earner man to work in the Church.

The key to understanding the process of all these decisions may be located in one word, sacrifice.

A good man may have to decide to allow his family not to follow the American Dream, which is a false construct and not based on Catholic Thinking.

Yesterday, I was discussing family dynamics in this day and age with a holy priest. He noted that the main impetus pushing decisions of fathers in even so-called good Catholics families has been materialism, (or consumerism). Catholic dads have fallen into the trap of putting financial decisions, or decisions concerning status of the family, before those necessary decisions directly involved with developing a spiritual life of the family.

To clarify this point, and to show the faulty thinking of many Catholic dads, one can look at five areas of the corruption of Catholic thinking into complete materialistic thinking.

The first area of concern has to do with where some dads have chosen to live. My father moved into a neighborhood so that we could easily get to Catholic schools, both elementary and secondary. Having access to good Catholic schools may be a priority to some Catholics who would not consider how important the entire Catholic school community may thrive simply by people living in close proximity to one another.

This ideal may be connected to the fact that people do not move near one another for the sake of community.

We did this in the 1970s, by watching when houses came up for sale in a neighborhood and phoning those in the community to consider the houses. That many families would move into a neighborhood was called "banding", as in banding together.  Many community relationships were built up simply by people not having to travel any distances to see each other during the week.

Dads must consider not merely the status of living in suburbia, but the larger needs which the families will face in hard times. Living close to real Catholic families must become a priority again.  Status must bend to the needs of the domestic church.

A second area of concern is the choosing of jobs for a higher wage rather than considering family time as a necessity. The domestic church take time to build up, time which must be a priority as we all face the growth of persecution. The formation of children in the virtues has to be a priority of the father, not merely the mother.

I have spoken with a father in recent days whose jobs has odd, irregular hours. He cannot always be home at the same time. Without a set schedule, his children suffer from the lack of the family rosary and even attending Mass together on Sunday, as he must work on Sundays.

Sadly, this state will not be able to be rectified in the near future. The domestic church cannot grow in chaos. Sometimes, a dad may not have a choice regarding jobs, but if he does, family prayer time and the formation of virtues among children must take precedence over all other considerations. This may mean the dad allowing the family to live a lower standard of comfort.

A dad must choose not to waste free time with trivia, as the days of trivia are quickly passing.

This note leads to the third area of concern. One dad I have spoken with in the past three months told me that he was cutting out computer time, reading blogs and twittering in order to give more time for prayer and leading his family. I admire his decision. He said that he realized that his own spiritual growth had to be a priority if his family would be able to grow in virtue. The shepherd must be purified to lead the sheep to such.

The proverbial "couch potato" dad cannot be a true shepherd. Children do not automatically become saints.

Another area of concern has to do with the sad, sad ideal of American families which involves a gross type of independence, which keeps them from being open to other Catholic families.

I have written before about the fact that family relationships can become idolatrous-the Kingdom of God comes first, not extended non-religious families.  Those who choose to build the Kingdom sometimes must leave family members behind for a greater good. 

The last area of concern, which can stop real community building in a parish, and I see this particularly in TLM communities, is an snobbery concerning the poor. Too many trads fall into the horrible habit of judging those in their churches. I have seen this again and again. A middle class couple may judge someone who wears jean skirts, or needs a ride, or does not socialize by eating out at restaurants, as the persons cannot afford this. Instead of inviting and even paying for lunches, people are excluded from discussion groups after Mass attended by the middle class. I think part of the problem is the loss of the large families of the past, which gathered people in. Adults raised in small families have problems reaching out.


I am not sure of all the reasons why many of the TLM groups or other faithful Catholics,  are not forming into real communities, where people relate on a daily basis and help each other both spiritually and physically. 

But, unless this happens, many people will be swept away in the horrible times to come either out of fear, or from a lack of support.


Dads, how you lead your families to God when your local churches look like these photos?


See the other posts on community building and on men.....