Recent Posts

Tuesday 24 April 2012

Another fight concerning the sovereignty of the Catholic Church


Ruins of Fountains Abbey, destroyed by the civil powers of England


Here is a section from lengthy article from the Catholic Herald online, April 20th, 2012, the paper which is worth reading if you are in Great Britain. If Catholics do not respond quickly, we shall become an underground Church yet again. Here is the link. Catholics world-wide, and especially in Europe, need to watch this encroachment of civil government over the Catholic Church. This is not merely a question of rights, but of the sovereignty of the Church.
Please pray, as some of us in France and England are having trouble with accessing Google, et al.

David Cameron will not be able to exempt the Churches from a duty to offer marriages to gay couples, a senior Catholic barrister has warned.
Neil Addison, the director of the Thomas More Legal Centre, said that the Prime Minister’s assurances to the Church that they would not be compelled to perform religious marriage for gay couples are worthless.
He said two judgments by the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg combined with a Court of Appeal ruling in 2010 clearly showed that the Government would be acting illegally if it legalised civil gay marriages without permitting them on religious premises too.
It means that if the Coalition Government presses ahead with its plans to redefine marriage to include gay couples the Catholic Church could face prosecution under equality legislation for acting according with its teachings.
The Government will be obliged to permit same-sex marriage on religious premises on exactly the same basis as it permits heterosexual marriage,” said Mr Addison, a specialist in religious discrimination law.
How this will affect the rights of Churches who are registered for marriage and in particular how it will affect the Church of England and its clergy who are registrars of marriage by virtue of their status as priests of the established Church is legally very arguable,” he said.
Certainly a good legal case can be made that any place or person who is registered to perform marriage must be willing to perform same-sex marriage on the same basis as they conduct heterosexual marriage since, in law, there will be no difference between the two.”
Mr Addison’s legal opinion is sharply at odds with the Government’s assurances, included in its consultation document launched last month, that a new law would “make no changes to religious marriages”.