There has been much bad teaching in some Catholic courses, colleges, universities and seminaries on what is invincible ignorance. The vast majority of people living in the Western world do not fall under the category of invincible ignorance. Those is nations were the Gospel and the Teachings of the Catholic Church have been severely suppressed may fall under this category. But, not people in the First World.
It is dangerous for Catholics to forget that many people choose not to become Catholics, after learning what Catholicism is. Those people are not ignorant of the Truths of the Church. We must pray and realize that many people say "no" to God in His Church. I believe grace is given to people in order to see and find the Truth. God denies no man or woman salvation. But, to pretend that those who have heard and have moved away from the Word are saved, is a dangerous position. We judge no one, but we cannot say that such and such a group of people under the Protestant banner will go to heaven. A misinformed or badly informed conscience is not invincible ignorance. Invincible ignorance means that the person involved has not heard the Gospel preached, nor has been given any opportunity for conversion to Catholicism. Those who persist in other faiths after having heard the Truth are not in invincible ignorance.
from EWTN
Outside The Church There Is No Salvation
The doctrine that "Outside the Church there is no salvation" is one that is constantly misinterpreted by those who won't submit to the Magisterium of the Church. Faith does not depend upon our ability to reason to the truth but on our humility before the Truth presented to us by those to whom Christ entrusted that task. This is why the First Vatican Council taught that it is the task of the Magisterium ALONE to determine and expound the meaning of the Tradition - including "outside the Church no salvation."
Concerning this doctrine the Pope of Vatican I, Pius IX, spoke on two different occasions. In an allocution (address to an audience) on December 9th, 1854 he said:
We must hold as of the faith, that out of the Apostolic Roman Church there is no salvation; that she is the only ark of safety, and whosoever is not in her perishes in the deluge; we must also, on the other hand, recognize with certainty that those who are invincible in ignorance of the true religion are not guilty for this in the eyes of the Lord. And who would presume to mark out the limits of this ignorance according to the character and diversity of peoples, countries, minds and the rest?
Again, in his encyclical Quanto conficiamur moerore of 10 August, 1863 addressed to the Italian bishops, he said:
It is known to us and to you that those who are in invincible ignorance of our most holy religion, but who observe carefully the natural law, and the precepts graven by God upon the hearts of all men, and who being disposed to obey God lead an honest and upright life, may, aided by the light of divine grace, attain to eternal life; for God who sees clearly, searches and knows the heart, the disposition, the thoughts and intentions of each, in His supreme mercy and goodness by no means permits that anyone suffer eternal punishment, who has not of his own free will fallen into sin.
These statements are consistent with the understanding of the Church contained in the documents of Vatican II, and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, as well as explaining why the rigorist position of Fr. Feeney (that all must be actual members of the Catholic Church to be saved) has been condemned by the Magisterium. It is ironic that precisely those who know their obligation to remain united to the Magisterium, and thus on whom this doctrine is morally binding, keep themselves from union with the Roman See on this point.
Answered by Colin B. Donovan, STL |
