Another Repost Because of The Supreme Court

Tuesday, 26 February 2013

A Time-Machine Back to 1581: the Death of an Enlightenment Democratic Monarchy

In this day and age of relativism, camps of opinion arise like midges on a hike in Alaska. 

One brushes away one set of  "arguments", only to find dozens flying into one's face. 

The media frenzy over the events of the past three weeks is not going to subside. On the contrary, 

we Catholics are entering into a new era of Church-bashing which will not go away.

The days of toleration for differing religious opinions, or at least, Catholic teaching, is over.

I watched two days of the Parliament hearings of witnesses regarding the civil union or rather 

same-sex-marriage act. I usually do not watch television, but I was visiting a friend who wanted 

to watch this swarm of opinions based on sola fide, sola scriptura; each man and woman on the 

panel proved to be his or her own pope.

The Church of England witnesses, as they were called, had eloquent and keen questions and answers. 

So did Archbishop Peter Smith and his legal team. I was impressed by the firm and clear positions given 

by these two groups.

Not so other groups, like the Church of Wales representatives, who waffled.

What did astound me was the out and out rudeness of some of the questioners, all of them MPs, 

not to be named here. One can look at my blog for names. I merely want to point out the lack of 

respect towards those representatives of organized religion. At several places in the presentation of 

answers by Archbishop Peter Smith, some members laughed out loud in derision for the Catholic 

position on marriage, pre-marital sex, and our anti-contraception, anti-abortion positions.

What came to my mind was that I could have been in a time-machine, taken back to the interrogations of 

Edmund Campion, Ralph Sherwin, or Robert Southwell et al.

The entire meeting of this Parliament panel on both days was a sham. The smug hypocritical statements of 

the members of Parliament shone out like words of old transcripts in a history of Recusant trials.

Parliament determines moral and religious policy in Britain, not the churches.

Parliament in 2013 mirrors Parliament in 1581, or 1585 or 1681, this last the year of the martyrdom of 

St. Oliver Plunkett. I have seen his head in St. Peter's Church, Drogheda. His face is peaceful, but reveals pain.

We honour martyrs in the Catholic Church almost daily. We of this Guild honour Titus Brandsma, 

who was martyred and is a Blessed. But, do we really want martyrs in 2013? Do we feel uncomfortable 

watching Peter Smith being derided? Do we want our leaders to stand firm on the ancient teachings of the 

One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church?

I hope we feel proud and strengthened by the witness of Truth.

I hope we stand with our leaders.

I hope we can see clearly that the actions of Parliament will lead to the type of society created under 

Henry VIII and Elizabeth I, where those who kept the Faith were fined, suffered financial loss, ruin, 

disgrace, if not martyrdom. Catholics will not be able to be registrars or superintendents of registrars. 

Catholics may not be able to be teachers in some schools. The Catholic priests may be in a position 

of disobedience to certain laws after judicial decisions.

Parliament acts just as it has since the Protestant Revolt. Parliament was given powers over the private

 consciences of the people of Britain and it will take those powers and use those again and again and again. 

Five hundred years of practice makes this pattern of oppression all too easy. There are precedences. 

We are witnessing the death of the modern Enlightenment democracy as a philosophy of governance. 

We are witnessing the sliding back to a time when religions were not allowed to stand in the marketplace 

and speak Truth.

The powers that be have not changed their philosophies. They have renewed an older pattern of intolerance 

which is wedded to the very power of Parliament.

The Catholic Church has not changed Her Truths, Revelation and Tradition.

We are, again, Non-Conformists, and as in the past, consequences will follow strongly held beliefs.

I hope those who belong to the Guild of the martyr Titus Brandsma know how to stand firm in the storms 

that will blow across Great Britain. We have an excellent example. Brandsma upheld the bishops' decisions 

and the clarity of teaching that Catholicism and Nazism clashed. Catholicism will always clash with falsehood.

As Catholic journalists, we of this Guild can follow our patron to whatever consequences may follow.

I, for one, will write as long as I can for Christ and His Church.