Recent Posts

Wednesday, 24 June 2015

Excellent Post on Gradualism

better than my posts earlier this year and last year...although I covered the points on grace.

And previous post leading up to this one...from same author:

Wednesday, 1 April 2015

What's at Stake at the Synod? Everything!


We are not equal - God isn't a democrat - in just the same way as there is a hierarchy of ranks among the 
angels there is a hierarchy of human souls and their perfectibility - it's known as Predilection. God loves us 
all infinitely and calls us to fulfill our created perfectibility - but some are created to be more - to do more
 [remember the parable of the sower? 30, 60, a hundredfold?]

God loves them more because they are created to be more lovable because they have a vocation to be more
... I know it doesn't sound fair but He's God: We're not - we have our place in His divine plan as either tiny cogs or
 hard-working pistons or massive power-wheels - whatever that position we were made for it - and can achieve 
perfection within it and be fulfilled with absolute joy and happiness in being everything we were called to be. 
God made us so we ultimately wouldn't ever wish to be anything but ourselves in our perfection in our part of 
His Divine plan [this is why envy - wanting to be another - is the greatest sin against oneself]

Finally on this point it must be noted that in regard to Predilection how we repent from and amend for our sins 
will also be variant - for some it will be easy and lengthy - for others it will be more grueling and intermittent.

Now, secondly we have to understand what the Holy Spirit is about - for most of us the Holy Spirit keeps us in 
existence, He inspires our intellects with truth, beauty and the notion of the good - which motivates our will to 
carry out this inspiration freely towards the good - this is what Love is. The Holy Spirit provides us with Sufficient 
Grace to never sin - He provides our intellects and consciences to be aware of the Good, the True and Beautiful - 
and we can conform to this and be truly free. Remember the only thing we are ever free to do is to do good - 
sin is always a denial of our freedom and actually traps us and makes us less free.

Alternatively, we can hoodwink ourselves into thinking happiness may be achieved through another route - 
a short-cut - an easy way - and hence we lie to ourselves and our God and our created reality and the rest of 
creation and we commit sin - and in the process we as temples of the Holy Spirit in whom we live, move and 
have our being - abuse and defy the Lord, the Giver of Life with our lies and sin. These are the only two things 
we can say we possess - every other thing comes from God, is worked by God and returns to God - every other 
thing is Grace of which we are unworthy but in which we we happy receivers can and should boast.

Normatively, the Holy Spirit works through Sufficient Grace, but there are times where through an extraordinary 
act of predelictive Love, the Holy Spirit acts upon us with what's known as efficient Grace - unstoppable, 
unpreventable grace which compels us towards an act.

There's an old Fulton Sheen story of a wayward alcoholic actress who accepts his invite to see the Church on the 
proviso he would not ask her to go to Confession - he kept the promise in his own way for as they were touring 
Church he opened the confessional door and threw her inside.

Divine Providence decrees that God does this to some of us in extraordinary circumstances. God does not work 
against our wills - but instead He takes over with Efficient grace to ensure something happens. Think the Conversion 
of St Paul and other profound conversion stories. Think Miracles. Think the imposition of the knowledge of God 
upon the Prophets or all who lived and believed during the Incarnation or the appearance of the Sacred Heart or 
Our Lady. Think of the Promises of Christ regarding Papal Infallibility and the inability of the Gates of the 
Underworld to prevail against the Church. All this is Efficient Grace - unpreventable, unthwartable - 
it has nothing to do with the arbitrary, discretionary choices within human free will. God just does it!

Sometimes God uses efficient Grace upon us to actuate His will. Otherwise, it is sufficient grace where we are at 
the helm of our wills - the Holy Spirit inspires our intellects and carries out our wills - but we choose - we decide. 
The Holy Spirit does not treat us like puppets or cosmic chess pieces - He limits himself to inspiration of the 
intellect to motivate the will - we choose whether to conform to that will or not. Hence in matters of the Church 
the Holy Spirit may inspire - but the Pope and his Brother Bishops and clerics and religious act according to their 
own either conformed or refusenik wills. The Holy Spirit does not choose a Pope - Cardinals choose a Pope. 
The Holy Spirit does not appoint 
Bishops - The Pope does. The Holy Spirit does not gerrymander or rig Synod or Oecumenical council votes - 
The Pope and Bishops vote.

Now, there is only one real argument against the existence of God - all the others fall apart when rationally 
confronted with reality but one remains - one so confrontational that it compelled Ivan Karamazov to refuse to 
participate and return his invitation to belong to God's creation: The problem of Evil and there is only one rational 

"How else can evil be allowed to exist, save for a greater good?"

God permits evil - He permits sin. Yes - nothing happens but what God wills - but there is a profound difference 
between what God wished [His Antecedent will] and what God permits [through which He will actuate a greater 
good] - i.e. His Consequent Will. God's antecedent will was for none to fall, for all to share Heaven in their created 
perfection with Him for eternity - for all to be saved. God's consequent will - because angels fell, because we fell, 
because we continue to sin and because ultimately some of us will not wish eternity with Him if the price means 
dying to our selfish vices - is axiomatically very different from God's original antecedent will.

Therefore when anything happens - we are absolutely forbidden from the presumption that what God's 
consequent will has permitted remotely conforms to that which His antecedent will desired.
Just because something happens - be it some remarkably fortuitous or ostensibly miraculous event or a revolution 
or a restoration or discovery or victory over an evil aggressor in war, or alternatively the horror of war and famine 
and personal tragedies or holocausts upon Jews, Chinese, Russians, the Unborn, our euthanised sick and unwanted,
 or the ravages of Spanish flu or AIDS or ebola we cannot attribute to God's antecedent will. In fact, we are 
absolutely prohibited from ever presuming it is part of God's antecedent will [eg Divine vindication/reward or
Divine retribution]. It is merely the case that what happens is what God permits. Nor can we surmise His will from 
the ostensible benefits or the blatantly obvious ravages of what God permits. We are guaranteed that God's 
resolution of it all is assuredly a greater Good.

Now comes the big crunch question: What in the name of all sanity has any of this to do with the impending 
Synod on Marriage and the Family? It's about the proposed reception of Holy Communion for civilly divorced 
and remarried Catholics and active homosexuals, isn't it? That the ongoing mortal sin of adultery and fornication 
should not be a barrier from being one in communion with one's neighbours? By appealing to mercy and tolerance 
and the notion of integration and unity and even [ironically] appealing to the notion of solidarity that no-one is i
isolated or alienated 
or ostracised? That we all be one?

What has any of this to do with God's sufficient grace or the Holy Spirit not treating us like puppets or God's 
antecedent and consequent will? Well the answer is quite simple: It has EVERYTHING to do with it! Primarily 
you have to understand how the world has been contaminated in two ways over the past two centuries - 
and how this ideological contamination has infected the mind-frame of those within the modern Church.

The first is easily recognised and understood contamination is Evolutionism. This is not meant in the limited 
biological sense regarding certain developments within certain species, but universal development of everything - 
absolute ever-fulfilling progressivism summed up by "things can only get better" or rather the promise that 
"things only do get better"  This is a serious error. For further reading look at the writings of Teilhard de Chardin, 
Emile Mersch and Karl Rahner and a host of moderns to understand this notion of everything evolving to some i
neffable ethereal omega point where we all become so like God we collectively usurp His role in some Buddhist 
nirvana of everything and nothing.

Secondly we have to get a bit philosophical - and although I'll skip the background of the whole metaphysical
 potency/act problem in presocratics through stoical pantheism and enlightenment naturalism and pantheism - 
[which Aristotle and Aquinas perfectly refuted and dealt with], we end up with the nightmare philosophy of 
Hegel which like a virus has infected every socio-cultural and political ideology of any wing and flavour - 
be it nazism or Stalinism, capitalism or revolutionary Marxism, libertarianism or totalitarianism.

Now I suppose yet again you're asking - what has Hegel to do with the Synod? Please bear with me for a few 
more minutes before I tell you. Hegel's philosophy is grounded in two main principles:

The Dialectic - This rests upon the premise that there is no actual truth or understanding of reality, that there 
cannot be as there is division and dissension and alienation. Therefore all is merely a movement towards a more 
truthful understanding through a position of compromise and unity between the extremes and tensions of all 
aspects of reality. In this paradigm, one takes two seemingly opposing positions and seeks the underlying truth 
within both to synthesise this thesis and antithesis into a higher thesis - which in turn is still imperfect and has 
opposition through an antithesis and must again be synthesised into a higher thesis into infinity as the process 

Now how can we be certain this process works and we won't be misguided or misdirected throughout this? 
Ah, but that's impossible because there is a 'universal spirit' within reality that seeks this unfolding, flourishing, 
unifying. coalescing synthesis of the dialectic. The principle at work here is that a spirit is leading ever onward and 
upward in all spheres of reality towards a universal holism - this spirit is known as The Geist. The Geist ensures the 
validity and integrity of the ideological system itself and its ultimate destiny in perfection. This, resting not on 
objective truth but something very tenuous can easily morph into something similar to all our 'utopianisms' of 
reichs, or a communist world-state, or universal randian liberty, or the integrationist wonderland of the 
multiculturalist or the feminist or the eco-warrior? We are enslaved to the machinations and functions of the 
Geist - we are part of a system which 
is inseparable from this unstoppable force leading humanity towards its inevitable destiny.

Now are you beginning to see where I'm coming from? The development of Doctrine? It being the will of the 
Holy Spirit ? In this world view, we are mere pawns and puppets of this Divine Will - this movement of this 
religious geist - the Holy Spirit - towards this evolving ever-re-flourishing progressive end.

In such a spiral,  or vortex, we are to seek an end to division and synthesise into uniformity and unity via a 
compromise dialectic which will placate and satisfy - where tolerance and 'mercy and charity' dwell - via 
acceptance of all and the elimination of alienation and ostracism. For we are all equal in the sight of God and 
none are loved more or less - and equality indicates sameness and uniformity and homogeneity where 
dissociating divisive factors like difference or independence or non-conformity are anathematised.

The Synod's proposed 'theology of mercy', the Kasperite position, is going to be grounded upon what I call 
"three great heresies and a lie". The first two heresies are going to be promoted at every opportunity in order
 to introduce a third with which the Church has been contaminated for centuries and which has manifested itself 
in three forms of a heresy against God's sufficient grace {Neo-Pelagianism/Molinism- then Jansenism- then 
Gradualism}. Rebel Bishops sought to impose at the Synod on the Family 35 years ago, but were halted in their 
tracks by Pope St John Paul II in Familiaris Consortio.

The first heresy is quite obvious:

That everything that happens within the Church conforms to the antecedent will of God - that God wished this 
for the Church from before creation - and that all movements of the Holy Spirit are manifestations of this Church 
progression - forward ever forward - we cannot go back - all is development and what God planned.

Of course, we have absolutely no idea whether it does or not. By such time, we will have dispensed with the holy 
doctrines and the integrity of the Church's discipline, which has been guided by the Holy Spirit. In truth, we are not 
open to the innermost mysteries of the Divine plan - but it would be the gravest presumption to not believe that 
the mass exodus out of the Church - that its secularisation and desacralisation - and its loss of the apologetic, 
its cultural identity and the falling away of so many are not merely what God permits in His consequent will - 
and were never part of His antecedent. But this naive ludicrous Hegelian optimism that it's all happened 
because it's what God always wished is a heresy.

The second heresy is simple. It is the idea that we are but pawns and puppets of the Holy Spirit in our wills - 
our Bishops and clerics and bodies of our reformist laity by their very existence and every thought, word and 
deed is all subsumed into the system by which the Holy Spirit moves them all towards the desired end. Of course 
this is a heresy - the Holy Spirit inspires our intellect - and we accept or reject and act accordingly - free will - 
defy and choose to sin.

Thus these two heresies will be promoted at every opportunity to lay the groundwork for the third. This is the 
heresy that you can guarantee through the major soundbites and buzzwords from the lips of all those who seek 
to change Catholic teaching via a perversion of its pastoral implementation by simply desiring it. This will be one of 

"We must allow the Holy Spirit space to reform the Church"

The third heresy is quite confusing, which is probably why during the last Extraordinary Synod there was almost 
universal ignorance of what the heresy entailed among Catholic journalists, commentators and media 
representatives who all spoke at great length while claiming great understanding about it, but every last one of 
them got it wrong.

In Familiaris Consortio Pope St John Paul II refers to the law of gradualism - an easily recognisable phenomenon - 
our gradual progression through the consequences of our sin after our repentance and absolution we are still weak ,
 weary and scarred and that it will take us a while to gradually heal.

BUT Pope St John Paul II rejects absolutely the heresy known as the Principle of Gradualism.
 I could go into this heresy at great length and explain its intricacies and consequences and the way it destroys 
the very fabric of the notion of grace and God's love for us and the integrity of the human person, but all you 
really need to know about it is that quite simply it denies God's sufficient grace to immediately repent of all sin or 
sinfulness - and the sufficient grace to not sin again.

In other words, using this 'principle' God does not provide sinners with the grace which will prevent them from 
being able to stop sinning or to not start sinning again. The underlying great lie in it all is 'God doesn't love us 
enough to get us out of our mess" Therefore, in this heretical viewpoint, all sinners cannot be expected to stop 
sinning immediately - they must be treated with compassion and understanding to be weaned off from their 
sinfulness - go on a sin-controlled diet - enter into a sin-reduction spiritual fitness plan, like methadone as 
replacement for heroin. It cannot be expected for severe or long-term sinners to immediately stop their sins - 
it is simply 'not possible' for them.

In other words the underlying message of this heresy is that when it comes to repentance and turning away from 
sin - GOD COMMANDS THE IMPOSSIBLE. This is a diabolical lie. The lie is that God has not provided the sufficient 
grace - therefore they cannot do it.

Now you see this is where the heresy comes undone and, incidentally, many Church fathers, St Augustine & the 
Council of Trent absolutely repudiate and refute Gradualism.

The heresy is not going to be very palatable to the collective faithful when it comes to the conclusion that God 
commands the impossible from sinners. This heresy has its ultimate conclusion that:

We sin and can't stop: and it's God's fault.

Hence the Gradualists - of which Kasper and his cronies are mere successors - have to now insert a lie into the 
equation. It's irrational - yes it's mendacious - yes it is the actions of anti-intellectual scoundrels, but this is what 
the Gradualists do if a heresy gives you the principle you want but not the conclusion you desire. You simply 
change the conclusion.

In order to retain this "Principle of Gradualism" they have to twist the argument on its head. It is not that God 
commands the impossible. How could He? He's a merciful, tolerant, forgiving, ever-loving and always charitable 
and inclusive God? 
It's not God that's demanding the impossible from these poor sinners trapped in their sinful ways needing slow, 
pastoral assistance and reassurance to slowly reduce their sinfulness. It's not God who is lacking in Love and Mercy.


It is the Church which is cruel and uncharitable and merciless and intolerant with its hyper-proscriptive 
alienating legalism and Donatism - its judgmentalism upon the sinner [actually it's judging the sin but they're
 on a roll here]. It is the Church's heartless, calcified, rigorist legalism which is to blame and this is NOT WHAT 

We are therefore not walking in God's ways. We are not living according to His Gospel and the values of His 
kingdom. We are standing in the way of His message of welcoming love which calls all sinners to Himself. 
Remember the ludicrous tag-line to the 
film "Love Story"? "Love means never having to say you're sorry". Well gradualism considers God's love means 
'we have nothing to ever say sorry about'

In other words when Our Lord said, "If you love Me you will keep My commands" He never really meant we had to 
do it! That's Donatism - that's heartless legalism. Haven't both Donatism and legalism been recently condemned 
by our Bishops Conference and Pope Francis?

Do you see what's at stake now? Have a little think about the ramifications of a single gradualist principle 
being inserted in any moral adjudication on pastoral practice and praxis within Holy Mother Church - even 
to something as seemingly remote as using it to justify the slow reception of people still in mortal sin to 
reception of the sacraments. A single gradualist principle sets a moral precedent which may subsequently be 
applied to any and every aspect of Catholic moral teaching and its pastoral applications.

In other words the entirety of moral and pastoral theology - contaminated with the lethal virus that sin is 
something with which we have to deal with, to negotiate with, compromise with, excuse and slowly wean people 
off from and lead people away from, becomes a hellish nightmare of counter-productive self-contradicting
heterodoxy, lie, fallacy and heresy-in-itself.

Catholic morality in one fell swoop would collapse and fall dead in the water - not merely ineffectual but directly 
counterproductive - but lethally destructive and toxic! Now, if you wish any further clarifications or explanations 
please ask in the combox - but I've already spent way too long writing and taken up far too much of your time.
Gradualism underfoot. For if the Gradualists were to succeed? The price would be too high for us all....